Pressure mounts in N Korea
The unexpected death of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il has brought fresh attention to that country’s uncertain future.
In the short run, observers have speculated that the North Korean leadership might initiate a military provocation to bolster new North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s credibility. Farther off in the future lie a number of other possibilities, including further nuclear tests, an internal power struggle or perhaps even an economic and political collapse.
The regime in Pyongyang is as anachronistic as it is tragic. An entire nation has been shut off from the rest of the world, its population ruthlessly brainwashed to worship a senseless political dynasty that is driving the country ever further into poverty and isolation. And now power has been hastily transferred to an untested 20-something with no meaningful leadership experience.
Such a situation is fundamentally untenable. It is has become increasingly difficult for any society, much less an entire country, to isolate itself from the rest of the world. The process of globalization — the ever-increasing interconnection of national economies, cultures and societies — has lead to higher living standards and greater political freedom the world over, and those who are forcibly excluded from this process have sooner or later found a way to be included.
There are many ways this can happen. Perhaps the two most prominent ways are through popular uprisings and through the implosion of failing regimes, which simply collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude and backwardness. The Arab Spring is an example of the former, while the former Soviet Union is an example of the latter.
If history is any guide, it will only be a matter of time before North Korea is opened up to the outside world. However, exactly how this will happen is anyone’s guess.
Let us all hope that North Korea’s integration into the international community, when it does finally happen, is as peaceful and orderly as possible. If the arrogance, shortsightedness and recklessness of the late Kim Jong-il are any indication of his son’s pretensions, leaders of the free world have little reason to be optimistic.
Alex Jeffers
Taipei
KMT is a joke
I must agree that the timing was poor for the release of news that the US was considering Taiwan for its visa waiver program (“Waiver shows US support for Ma: KMT,” Dec. 24, page 1). The move only means that the US has said that Taiwan has finally met all the requirements to be considered for this program — it is not because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is such a good leader.
The process began when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office; it is not something that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) started. As a foreigner living in this country for more than 10 years and having watched the powers-to-be struggling here on a daily basis, I know that anything completed by the KMT was also blocked by the KMT when the opposition party was in power. You name it, they blocked it with their numbers. The purchase of military weapons comes to mind, for example.
Now the KMT wants to claim the credit for something that was started by the Democratic Progressive Party. I for one would not sell the upgraded F16s to the current government for fear that they would later be found with the Chinese flag stenciled on the side of them.
If the politicians from any other country lived here, they would see how scheming and conniving the current government is and the KMT is, and they would not in any way support them. This is the common feeling from many of my friends who live here, but come from other countries. Many stay here, like myself, because of the friendly people. Others stay here out of curiosity to see how long Taiwanese will put up with this nonsense.
I am pretty sure that former leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) would totally disavow the current government. He is probably turning over in his grave right now. The KMT has not had an original thought since the dinosaur age. Every time there is a major election with a lot at stake, the current government conveniently brings up charges through their puppets at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division to use against the opposition party to cast them in a bad light. Then when the election is over, it all goes away. No foreigner is fooled and neither are Taiwanese.
The recent Yu Chang fiasco by the KMT and their puppet, Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如), who can’t seem to get the dates straight because she can’t remember which change she made, or when. How many years ago was this? Coincidence? Document transfers to the new “regime”? Three years later? How clumsy of someone. I would think that they need to be fired for their incompetency.
I could go on and on, but it upsets me to see this current government just always lying to the people and running up the country’s debt and taking away their civil liberties piece by piece.
We can’t fly the Taiwan flag when “friends” of the government come to Taiwan. It was reported that Chinese hackers hacked into photos of Facebook’s new headquarters and removed or altered the Taiwan flag from the photo (“Netizens blast tampering,” Dec. 26, page 2).
I agree with the statement made by one netizen who said: “President Ma Ying-jeou would order the national flags to be taken down when Chinese officials visit anyway.”
It can only get worse with the current government. Vote well and carefully, Taiwan.
Wei Bao-lo
New Taipei City
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations