Pressure mounts in N Korea
The unexpected death of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il has brought fresh attention to that country’s uncertain future.
In the short run, observers have speculated that the North Korean leadership might initiate a military provocation to bolster new North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s credibility. Farther off in the future lie a number of other possibilities, including further nuclear tests, an internal power struggle or perhaps even an economic and political collapse.
The regime in Pyongyang is as anachronistic as it is tragic. An entire nation has been shut off from the rest of the world, its population ruthlessly brainwashed to worship a senseless political dynasty that is driving the country ever further into poverty and isolation. And now power has been hastily transferred to an untested 20-something with no meaningful leadership experience.
Such a situation is fundamentally untenable. It is has become increasingly difficult for any society, much less an entire country, to isolate itself from the rest of the world. The process of globalization — the ever-increasing interconnection of national economies, cultures and societies — has lead to higher living standards and greater political freedom the world over, and those who are forcibly excluded from this process have sooner or later found a way to be included.
There are many ways this can happen. Perhaps the two most prominent ways are through popular uprisings and through the implosion of failing regimes, which simply collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude and backwardness. The Arab Spring is an example of the former, while the former Soviet Union is an example of the latter.
If history is any guide, it will only be a matter of time before North Korea is opened up to the outside world. However, exactly how this will happen is anyone’s guess.
Let us all hope that North Korea’s integration into the international community, when it does finally happen, is as peaceful and orderly as possible. If the arrogance, shortsightedness and recklessness of the late Kim Jong-il are any indication of his son’s pretensions, leaders of the free world have little reason to be optimistic.
Alex Jeffers
Taipei
KMT is a joke
I must agree that the timing was poor for the release of news that the US was considering Taiwan for its visa waiver program (“Waiver shows US support for Ma: KMT,” Dec. 24, page 1). The move only means that the US has said that Taiwan has finally met all the requirements to be considered for this program — it is not because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is such a good leader.
The process began when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office; it is not something that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) started. As a foreigner living in this country for more than 10 years and having watched the powers-to-be struggling here on a daily basis, I know that anything completed by the KMT was also blocked by the KMT when the opposition party was in power. You name it, they blocked it with their numbers. The purchase of military weapons comes to mind, for example.
Now the KMT wants to claim the credit for something that was started by the Democratic Progressive Party. I for one would not sell the upgraded F16s to the current government for fear that they would later be found with the Chinese flag stenciled on the side of them.
If the politicians from any other country lived here, they would see how scheming and conniving the current government is and the KMT is, and they would not in any way support them. This is the common feeling from many of my friends who live here, but come from other countries. Many stay here, like myself, because of the friendly people. Others stay here out of curiosity to see how long Taiwanese will put up with this nonsense.
I am pretty sure that former leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) would totally disavow the current government. He is probably turning over in his grave right now. The KMT has not had an original thought since the dinosaur age. Every time there is a major election with a lot at stake, the current government conveniently brings up charges through their puppets at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division to use against the opposition party to cast them in a bad light. Then when the election is over, it all goes away. No foreigner is fooled and neither are Taiwanese.
The recent Yu Chang fiasco by the KMT and their puppet, Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如), who can’t seem to get the dates straight because she can’t remember which change she made, or when. How many years ago was this? Coincidence? Document transfers to the new “regime”? Three years later? How clumsy of someone. I would think that they need to be fired for their incompetency.
I could go on and on, but it upsets me to see this current government just always lying to the people and running up the country’s debt and taking away their civil liberties piece by piece.
We can’t fly the Taiwan flag when “friends” of the government come to Taiwan. It was reported that Chinese hackers hacked into photos of Facebook’s new headquarters and removed or altered the Taiwan flag from the photo (“Netizens blast tampering,” Dec. 26, page 2).
I agree with the statement made by one netizen who said: “President Ma Ying-jeou would order the national flags to be taken down when Chinese officials visit anyway.”
It can only get worse with the current government. Vote well and carefully, Taiwan.
Wei Bao-lo
New Taipei City
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry