The Child Welfare League Committee is worried that young people are becoming addicted to cellphones. While the committee’s concern is laudable, it’s probably too late to worry about young people becoming addicted, given the behavior of their elder siblings and parents. Instead, society as a whole should question the ubiquitous presence and use of cellphones, even where they have been banned by law, and come up with rules of usage and decorum — even if the nation’s economy is somewhat dependent upon the production and sale of such devices.
The committee conducted a survey that found cellphone usage among urban children had grown 22 percent compared with six years ago, with more than half of fifth and sixth-graders using cellphones, 69.1 percent of seventh-graders and 71.5 percent of eighth-graders. The good news from the league’s survey is that children are using their phones for almost everything but talking. Almost 60 percent of respondents said they spend less than five minutes a day talking on their cellphones. Instead they use them to text their friends, listen to music, take photographs or videos and play online games.
The committee is not pushing for a ban on use at school, but for parents to give their children basic cellphones, not fancy smartphones, as well as setting usage rules and monitoring their children’s use of the phones.
The Taiwan Electromagnetic Radiation Hazard Protection and Control Association (TEPCA) is more concerned about the risk posed by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and the link to cancer, which is why it has been monitoring cellphone use by children. In June, it urged the government to ban children under the age of 15 from using cellphones on school grounds after a WHO warning that there might be a link between cellphone use and brain cancer among frequent users. However, as the WHO report defined “heavy use” as 30 minutes a day over a 10-year period, many people in Taiwan, not just children, are already at risk.
The league and the TEPCA might get their message across more effectively if they could get parents to monitor their own cellphone usage, and teach by example.
How many times have you seen parents or other adults sit down at a restaurant table, lay their cellphones next to their plate — and then proceed to answer or make calls, or take photographs of the food throughout their meal? How many times have we seen a man (and yes, it’s predominantly men) walking down the street with two or more cellphones attached to his belt and another in his hand?
Whatever happened to the law that it is illegal to drive while talking on a handset? When is the last time it was enforced? Hardly a day goes by that you don’t see a driver blocking traffic because he or she is trying to negotiate a turn with one hand on the wheel while trying to talk on a cellphone — or motorcyclists with a cellphone wedged under their helmet so they don’t miss a call.
It is time that lawmakers reviewed the laws covering cellphone use by motorists, to increase both the enforcement of the law and penalties for breaking it, as well as expanding it to include texting while driving.
The US and some other countries are even mulling the possibility of banning the use of hand-free sets, saying that they are too much of a distraction for the average driver. While that may prove too extreme for Taiwan, it is at least worthy of debate in the legislature.
Cellphones are here to stay. A little common sense goes a long way to ensuring that their use does not interfere with others or put people’s lives at risk.
Unfortunately for those who lack common sense, there is no app for that — yet.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations