When the people of Taiwan vote in presidential and legislative elections next month, nobody will be more interested in the outcome than Beijing and Washington.
The reason: Whoever is elected will most likely exert a strong influence on the course of Taiwan’s relations with China for the foreseeable future. If those relations are not handled well, it could cause a dangerous confrontation which could, in turn, lead to hostilities between the US and China.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who is running for re-election, says he would continue his efforts to ease tensions between China and Taiwan.
His main challenger, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), promises to continue some of Ma’s approaches to Beijing, but would insist on asserting Taiwan’s sovereignty and separation from China.
A third candidate, People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), has no chance of winning, but will take unknown numbers of votes from the other two candidates, making the result even more unpredictable.
“This whole thing is too close to call,” an experienced US diplomat said.
He and others are skeptical of the accuracy of pre-election polls, most of which show Ma slightly ahead.
Chinese leaders are watching intently because they have long said that Taiwan is a part of China and that the 23 million Taiwanese must return to the embrace of the “motherland.” China might resort to military force to achieve that.
Opposing that claim, the US has said the future of Taiwan must be dependent on the consent of the people and be peaceable. The Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 might require the use of US military force to prevent conquest by China.
Beijing has let it be known that it favors Ma, even though he comes from the KMT, their long-term adversary. Ma is seen as being more receptive to Beijing’s position on economic issues and not opposed to Taiwan’s eventual unification with China.
From Washington’s point of view, Ma is to be applauded for cooling tempers in cross-strait relations. On the other hand, he has done little to improve Taiwan’s ability to defend itself. Military spending, for instance, has hovered just above 2 percent of GDP, rather than the 3 percent he pledged before taking office.
In contrast, Tsai is held suspect by Beijing because her party advocates independence. However, she is considered more moderate on that issue than former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP, who served from 2000 to 2008.
“She sees no need to be confrontational,” a Tsai supporter said in Taipei.
If elected, Tsai would seek to strengthen Taiwan’s military forces to hold off a Chinese invasion long enough for the US to come to its aid. She would also seek to improve military ties with US forces, particularly the Pacific Command, which is headquarted in Hawaii.
Officials in US President Barack Obama’s administration have taken no public position, as is usual when other nations hold elections. Privately, they said that Ma’s stance was known and they foresaw no surprises. However, they also pointed out that Tsai had been involved in cross-strait relations as Mainland Affairs Council chairperson, the main channel of communication with Beijing.
The Associated Press reported from Taipei that the campaign had been relatively low-key until a televised debate a week ago when Ma sought to link Tsai to Chen, who has been jailed on -corruption charges.
Tsai retorted that she was running in 2012, not 2008, and accused Ma of opening the door for China to bring Taiwan under its sway. Instead, she portrayed herself as a centrist who would unify the people of Taiwan to deal with China.
Whatever the outcome, it seems fair to conclude that this campaign has nourished the roots of Taiwan’s democracy. The election of then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) of the KMT in 1996 marked the first direct presidential election in the history of Chinese-speaking peoples. Next year’s vote, on Jan. 14, will be the fifth such election.
About 66 percent of Taiwan’s voters are expected to cast ballots, compared with 58.5 percent in 2008 and 76 percent in 1996. In the US, 61.7 percent of the voters turned out in 2008.
In addition, press reports from Taipei say that last week’s campaign debate was carried by television and the Internet to China. The result of the voting is also expected to be carried on the same media. In the past, the Chinese government, which does not care for displays of democracy, has often banned such reports.
Richard Halloran is a commentator base in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under