Acapulco’s bay sparkled and the big hotels that line the beach glinted in the sunlight in the view from Marino Casiano’s tiny apartment high in the hills above the resort. However, the taxi driver’s gaze was inward, clinging to the last shred of hope that his teenage son, abducted by gunmen in March, was still alive.
“I want to believe that they took him to recruit him into organized crime and took him somewhere else in the country to fight,” he said in a tone of controlled despair. “Either that or he is in a clandestine grave.”
Life for Casiano and the majority of the city’s 780,000 permanent residents has always diverged from the image of unbridled fun the resort seeks to project. However, life scraping by on the edge of the tourism economy is now also shrouded in the personal tragedies, pervasive fear and additional financial woes associated with one of the major fronts in Mexico’s drug wars.
“I blame the president,” Casiano said. “What is the use of attacking the drug traffickers and bringing down capos [drug lords] if there are always others to take their place? If things get worse for ordinary people?”
Five years ago last Sunday, Mexican President Felipe Calderon kicked off his presidency by declaring an offensive against the cartels whose escalating turf wars along a major cocaine supply route north had started to become a real problem in a few areas of Mexico. However, in the five years since, the military-led onslaught has served only to multiply the carnage. At least 46,000 people have been killed — one an hour — making some Mexican cities among the deadliest in the world.
Calderon remains defiant in the face of growing criticism of his strategy.
“We are going to continue defending the citizens until the last day of my term,” he said at an event to mark the fifth anniversary of his government last week. “Those who say that it would have been better not to confront the criminals are completely mistaken. If we hadn’t done this, they would have advanced in our communities and our institutions.”
Feeding corn on the cob to her three-year-old child outside their home in one of the poor barrios that line the road to the airport and the motorway to Mexico City, Marley is unconvinced.
“The president says the good people outnumber the bad people, but that isn’t true,” she said.
She did not want her surname revealed for fear of being identified.
“I see more bad people every day and I don’t trust anybody any more,” she said.
On at least five occasions, the young woman said, she had had to bundle her children indoors when armed groups started shooting at each other or at the police. Two months ago, she was caught in the middle of a gun battle while at the market, and had to take cover in a shop.
Then there are the bodies dumped on the road or hung from bridges, the severed heads left in places for all to see.
“If we are ever able to save the money up for the journey, we will leave,” Marley said, nodding at the little stall of T-shirts she sells. “It’s not good for the children when they can tell the difference between firecrackers and guns.”
Acapulco’s turf wars are an extreme version of the general trend of cartel fragmentation prompted by second-tier figures fighting over the spoils left by capos who have been arrested or killed.
According to Eduardo Guerrero, a drug war expert, there were six cartels when the offensive began. Now there are 16. Of these, he believes, only the Sinaloa cartel, the Zetas and the Gulf cartel have the capacity to traffic drugs internationally on any scale. The rest concentrate on kidnapping, extortion rackets and controlling local drug user markets. They tend to be particularly violent because they seek total control of the territories in which they operate.
“The fragmentation of the cartels is the product of the initial strategy of going after them without any prioritization,” he said. “The government did not realize the problems this would bring with the dispersal of the violence.”
The three most visible groups in Acapulco are the Independent Cartel of Acapulco, the Barredora (which means mechanical street sweeper in Spanish) and the Devil’s Commando. All stem from the Beltran Leyva cartel, itself a split from Sinaloa in 2008 that went on to divide again after its leader was killed in December 2009.
The battle for control of Acapulco escalated after the arrest in August of the faction leader who held together the structure in the resort. The three groups fighting over it are believed to have loose links with other organizations, in particular Sinaloa, though others, including the Juarez cartel, La Familia and even the Zetas, are rumored to be fluttering on the fringes of the conflict.
The killing reached a peak in August when, local officials say, 148 people died during the month and the year’s total was approaching 1,000. The door of the morgue was plastered with appeals to help find the missing, whom the authorities largely ignore.
By that time the bloodletting had spread beyond the poverty-stricken outskirts into the main tourist area along the beach — a disaster for the resort, which is still a mainstay for tourism despite a loss of glamor since the days when Elizabeth Taylor used to visit.
The local authorities say room occupancy rates remain healthy, but say restaurants and bars have suffered acutely because holidaymakers rarely stray from their hotels into streets left empty by an informal sundown curfew.
The federal and state governments launched a major operation in early October, filling the city with 2,500 members of the army, navy and federal police, as well as 600 state police and a battery of equipment to add to the 1,500 local officers. The official daily death toll has fallen from 3.6 in the two months before the operation to 1.6 in the same period after it, and the operation is now touted as a great success.
However, will it last? In Ciudad Juarez, an increase in the military presence in the spring of 2009 saw a similar period of relative calm. Then the violence got worse than ever and established the border city as the most violent front of all.
The Acapulco operation claims to have learned from the mistakes of the past. It boasts an unprecedented level of coordination between the different forces, and promises more sophisticated efforts to clean up local police riddled with corruption, as well as social programs aimed at stopping the young and poor getting pulled into organized crime.
“Otherwise things become like Penelope waiting for Ulysses,” police spokesman Arturo Martinez said. “What you weave in the day, you unpick at night.”
However, while there is cautious optimism in the city center, where the holiday atmosphere is beginning creep back, skepticism is rife in the barrios.
“This whole thing is a pantomime to keep the tourists happy, but for people like us, it will get worse again soon,” said Juana, 58, as she rocked her coughing grandchild in a hammock in the shop where she sells homemade pinatas. “The kids going around with guns are getting younger every day.”
Juana, who did not want to give her full name, got caught in the middle of a shootout inside the jail in June when visiting her son.
“If they can’t even control the prison, how do you think they can control what happens outside?” she asked.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations