The first presidential debate between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) was held on Saturday. All three candidates expressed themselves admirably, sounding very democratic and eloquent, which was good in that it showed the world how far democracy has come in Taiwan. The problem was that, as the debate unfolded, there was much of interest, but very little substance. None of the three candidates came up with any comprehensive ideas or policies.
Polls taken after the debate showed that Ma held up pretty well, maintaining his lead. However, this was more a reflection of how he had conducted himself in the debate, how good his delivery and debating skills were, rather than public preference for his politics over the other two candidates. For example, Ma was at considerable pains to lump Tsai in with former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), starting by criticizing Chen and his corrupt administration and going on to say that if Tsai were to win, she would forever be under Chen’s shadow. He concluded by saying Tsai was somehow an extension of Chen, playing on the public’s negative impression of the former president. Tsai countered that they were debating next year’s presidential election, that this was not 2008 and that Ma was standing against her, not Chen.
Anyone would think from the way Ma was relentlessly pursuing Tsai that it was Ma who was the leader of the opposition, and Tsai, calmly parrying the attacks, the head of government defending her record. Mounting strong attacks in a debate is a good tactic: It shows that you are strong, it keeps the opponent from attacking you and gets them on the back foot, hopefully responding rashly and making forced errors.
During the debate, Ma cited all sorts of facts and figures to back up his assertion of what his administration has achieved over the past three-and-a-half years and how hard he had been working to put the country’s house in order after the Chen years. The cold, hard facts may have sounded impressive to the president, but they were met with less enthusiasm by his audience. Tsai has managed to engage her supporters on a much more emotive level, with her piggy bank and “female Robin Hood” successes. Ma’s campaign has faltered because it has been overly centered on himself and has struggled to resonate with the public.
Ma is perhaps a little reluctant to make sweeping promises for the next four years, as the opposition and press alike have been reminding him of his failure to make good on those made in the 2008 campaign. Back then, he promised to achieve 6 percent annual economic growth, an average per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of below 3 percent — better known as his “6-3-3” policy — by next year. Now, however, he has been famously non-committal.
Blessed recently with a lack of controversies or difficult political challenges, Ma has turned to talking up his idea of a “golden decade.” Instead of directly addressing issues relating to cross-strait political negotiations, joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership or finally implementing a two-day weekend for all workers, which government agencies have adopted more than a decade ago, he is just focused on pushing his “golden decade.” Think about it: If Ma does manage to secure a second term, what is he going to do with another four years? Where will Taiwan be at the end of it?
There is still more than a month before the election and there will be one more televised presidential debate. All three candidates still have a chance to strengthen their positions and to address their weak points. Ma may need to rethink his strategy. If he is going to continue attacking his opponents, in the absence of offering strong policies of his own, the moderate, swing voters will not be impressed.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations