The EU says that the world’s top three polluting nations are the biggest obstacles to establishing a time-line for a legally binding agreement on global warming and it won’t “cave in” on its demands.
China, the US and India seem the most reluctant to sign up to the EU’s road map pointing toward the next climate treaty after the limits in the current one expire next year, said Artur Runge-Metzger, the EU’s lead envoy on the environment said.
“The biggest barriers are the major emitters when it comes to the road map,” Runge-Metzger said yesterday in an interview at UN talks in Durban, South Africa. “Legally binding is a red line. It’s absolutely essential to get that road map.”
The fate of the EU’s time-line is the key toward preserving the Kyoto Protocol, which restricts fossil fuel emissions through next year. China, India and Brazil say extending that treaty is essential to keeping the international system of rules on climate change. Japan, Russia and Canada refuse to sign up for new commitments under Kyoto. The US never adopted the treaty.
The EU is part of a coalition of ambition seeking a time-line at the talks, said Kelly Dent, chief climate policy adviser for the development charity Oxfam, noting support for the proposal from African and island-nations and the bloc of least developed countries.
“If India, China or Brazil joined them, it would put enormous pressure on the others and the US,” Dent said. “We can’t have the Kyoto Protocol die on African soil.”
The EU wants the largest emitters to agree by 2015 on a binding agreement to be enacted in 2020 at the latest, and has offered in exchange an extension to the carbon-reduction goals under Kyoto. That would require China and other developing nations whose emissions weren’t capped under Kyoto to accept mandatory targets.
“In these negotiations little words can make an enormous difference, so we have to see what Brazil can be comfortable with,” Brazilian delegation chief Andre Correa do Lago told reporters on Thursday in Durban, when asked about the EU road map. “If it works towards strengthening the convention, the flexibility on words can be there on both sides.”
Debate over Kyoto is the biggest political source of friction at the talks this year and nearly derailed last year’s agreement in Cancun, Mexico. The envoys are also debating a package of technical measures that would advance the fight against global warming, including details about how a Green Climate Fund would work, channeling as much as US$100 billion a year to developing nations by 2020.
The US joined Saudi Arabia and Venezuela in raising concerns about the fund, forcing the UN to undertake informal consultations to find a resolution. Envoys had hoped to endorse the proposal this week.
The EU comments indicate little room for flexibility over the road map plan. The EU has done the most to trim carbon emissions since the agreement was negotiated in 1997, and its support for the measure is important for Kyoto’s preservation.
“There must be a clear understanding that the result of this road map is going to bind all countries,” Runge-Metzger said.
The EU will not cave in on its request, he said, adding that the Kyoto treaty is insufficient as it stands.
“The Kyoto Protocol with 11, 12, 13, 14 percent of emissions is just not going to win the fight against climate change,” he said.
Earlier this week, Chinese envoy Su Wei (蘇偉) said the EU request was shifting the goal posts “and leaving the climate talks in peril.” Brazil’s delegate said his country couldn’t envision an agreement this year without an extension for Kyoto.
China thinks it is too soon for the road map and that the world should wait on a broader system of greenhouse gas limits until a review of climate science by the UN is complete in 2014, Runge-Metzger said.
The US has said it wouldn’t commit to a road map promising a treaty until it had a sense what that agreement would look like. India has said developed nations should move first in making cuts in recognition of their “historic responsibilities” for creating global warming.
“What we observe is there is an interest to discuss and explore in terms of what would it mean, what would it look like, what would it entail for the different parts of the world, what type of time-lines, so it’s quite constructive in that respect,” Runge-Metzger said.
“We need to find a way forward with them,” he said.
“There are many other developing countries who are with us and saying: ‘We want to embark on that journey, and we want to see a legally binding instrument in a few years time,’” he added.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs