On Wednesday, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Central Standing Committee passed a two-phase proposal for legislative reform.
The first stage consists of four parts: strengthening the committee seniority system to avoid party negotiations overriding committee expertise; establishing a system allowing the legislature to launch investigations and hold public hearings so it can efficiently oversee the executive branch; setting up clear and unambiguous rules to avoid conflict of interest; and making the Procedure Committee a neutral and transparent institution.
The second stage consists of amending the legislative electoral system to address the representative imbalance between districts (for example, the lone legislator from Matsu represents a population of 9,000, while a legislator from Taiwan proper represents an average of 300,000 people) and the problem of legislators only paying attention to issues related to their own electoral districts instead of taking a wider perspective.
The DPP’s passage of this proposal has ratcheted up the call for democratic reform via the upcoming elections.
The quality of legislative deliberation in Taiwan has been heavily criticized, with the legislature being branded one of the worst in the democratic world. Not only has this brought shame to the country, but the poor state of the legislature has also damaged the rights of the public and prevented the nation’s competitiveness from improving.
While there are many reasons why the legislature has reached this state, the key problems are a weak systemic foundation and the lack of support for constructive systemic development.
The weak systemic foundation stems from the rule of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), who, in order to block the legislature from acting as an effective counterbalance to the executive branch, introduced a system that was different from other nations.
One example is the spoils-sharing system, with each legislative committee having three conveners to allow the Chiangs to divide and conquer. Another is the semi-annual shake up of conveners and legislators on the different committees to suppress the level of specialization and prevent the public hearings and investigations necessary to maintain the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government.
To retain its control over the legislature, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has worked hard to maintain these systemic shortcomings despite the fact that the whole legislature is now elected. Although academics and reform-minded legislators have repeatedly pushed for change, progress has been very difficult.
The lack of support for constructive systemic development can be seen in the unique, legally regulated system of closed-door negotiations between the government and the opposition which was established in 1999 — and which has only served to thoroughly destroy the spirit of specialized inquiry.
Apart from these, halving the number of legislative seats has thoroughly destroyed the democratic principle that every vote should have the same value.
Since the KMT’s control of the legislature has not only blocked reform, but also created a whole new set of systemic irregularities, the DPP has seized the right moment to push for legislative reform at a time when even Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) of the KMT says his party might have lost the chance to retain its legislative majority.
Given the public’s disgust with the legislature, the DPP’s call for legislative reform is very timely. DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has introduced her political views in the party’s 10-year guidelines and if DPP legislators push the call for legislative reform, they could launch a two-pronged strategy to take the edge off the KMT’s strategic combination of two elections in one day.
The calls for legislative reform are also a timely reminder about of the emphasis placed on the legislator-at-large lists. Legislative reform will have to overcome the obstacles posed by vested interests and this requires strong leadership. Looking at it from this perspective, both the DPP and the KMT should re-evaluate the significance of their legislator-at-large lists.
The KMT has emulated the DPP in nominating several representatives of disadvantaged groups and legislators who “don’t do as they’re told,” such as Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) and Tseng Chu-wei (曾巨威).
Its list might look good, but it raises three questions.
If the KMT wants reform, then why does Minister of Finance Lee Sush-der (李述德), who has been so severely criticized by Yaung and Tseng, remain in his job, instead of letting Tseng replace him? How should the public interpret this? Are they double dealing by keeping Lee for policymaking, while using Yaung and Tseng to tidy up the party’s image?
Letting Tseng and Yaung into the legislature without being willing to change the current approach of using it as the government’s private legislative office is in fact the same as depriving the duo of their supervisory tools. Isn’t that the same as proving the accusations that Yaung and Tseng simply are the tools of Ma’s double dealing?
Finally, since the DPP has already developed a proposal for legislative reform, all that remains to be seen is how the party will use its presidential and legislative election campaign strategies to give its legislative candidates the chance to fight a successful battle and bring about legislative reform.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.