Dave Birch has some harsh words for the European Central Bank (ECB).
“They should be prosecuted,” he says. “For printing the 500 euro [US$673] note. What possible use could there be for it except illegal transactions?”
You might think that the ECB would have more pressing matters at the moment, with the euro threatening to collapse into a shuddering pile of debts and sky-high bond yields. However, the point that Birch, a director at electronic transaction consultancy Consult Hyperion, is making is that it is things like printing physical notes that have helped to get the eurozone into its present calamitous position: one where Greece’s tax receipts in no way reflect actual spending by its citizens, and Italy’s “black economy” is reckoned to be about 20 percent of the overall economy there.
However, there is another way. Money is turning virtual. More and more of our transactions are digital anyway, but soon even those for which we think cash is essential — the low-value transactions that make up about 65 percent by volume (but far less in value) of transactions in the UK annually — will go digital.
From next year, Londoners will be able to use their Visa cards just as they do their Oyster cards, swiping them against monitors on buses and at underground stations to pay for their journeys.
You can even, if you are feeling Dick Tracy-ish, now get a £99 (US$155) watch that can be loaded with money, like an Oyster, and used to pay for your lunch/lattes/wine with one quick tap at high-street chains such as Pret A Manger, Subway, McDonald’s or Oddbins. Your transactions are limited to a maximum of £15 a time, and it is being marketed as great for runners (“Buy your bottled water! Your newspaper! Without taking your wallet!”) or for parents who want their children to pay for little bits and bobs, rather than blowing all their money on some gewgaw. Or, indeed, on other stuff that is sold on the streets, for although drug dealers are resourceful, they have not quite got themselves hooked into the electronic payments system yet.
Birch, though, thinks the “watch2pay” system will be a flop.
“Kids don’t wear watches,” he says simply. “They use their phones.”
And it is the mobile that is really powering the change in how we spend money.
“One of the big things we have been looking at is whether there’s enough of an appetite among the banks to develop a mobile payments structure,” says Sandra Quinn, head of communications at the British Payments Council, which handles transactions at the major clearing banks. “You’d use your phone to transfer money to, say, your best friend — you text your bank and tell it to send Pete £20.”
Sounds futuristic? Something like that has been running in Africa since 2003: called M-PESA (set up with funding from the British Department for International Funding and Development), it lets people transfer credits to mobile phones, which they can then swap for cash at various outlets.
So there is no real problem in doing it. The real problem is in our attitudes to money, and transactions.
People do love old ways of doing things. When the British Payments Council announced two years ago that checks were entering the sunset of their life and would be phased out by October 2018, the howls of outrage could be heard up and down the land. The council said that after 350 years, there would be “no scenario” for writing checks by that date. (Even so, its forecast suggested there would be around 400 million checks written in 2017, compared with 750 million in 2008.)
No scenario? What about the school dinner money checks, people asked? What about paying the builder who did that work on your house? What about all those transactions where the payee is not necessarily a shop, to whom you might want to make some small or gigantic payment? What about them? Questions were asked in parliament. Early Day Motions (the member of parliament’s equivalent of a Facebook petition) were signed. In the face of the media storm, the British Payments Council relented. Checks could stay, it said.
However, secretly, experts expect that they will go away anyway. Quinn suggests that the 18-year-olds of today — used to buying things online, whether using credit cards, Facebook credits, iTunes vouchers, PayPal or other virtual methods — probably will not, in seven years’ time, want to find a piece of paper on which to scribble their name. They will have some M-PESA-like system that will enable them also to pay the builder, or for the school lunches.
Birch is more blunt.
“I’m incensed that [the UK’s Payments Council] went back on killing off cheques,” he says. “There are plenty of countries where people don’t even know what a check is. The idea that by 2018 you won’t be able to do anything with a mobile phone that you can with a bit of paper and a pen now is just laughable.”
Indeed, some of the biggest names in mobile are already pushing things in that direction. Google has for the past year included systems in its Android smartphone software that let suitably equipped phones use “Near Field Communications” (NFC), where your cellphone stores your debit or credit card data, and you enter a pin and wave it near a suitably equipped register, and your payment is made.
The NFC forum includes 140 companies, with every major smartphone manufacturer apart from Apple, which has not yet indicated what it thinks of NFC. (The watch2pay uses an NFC implementation from MasterCard.) With more than half of the UK population already having a smartphone, and at least a third of the US population, the tide of cellphones enabled to do some sort of mobile transaction is rising.
However, Birch thinks one of the biggest benefits of digital money comes through its ability to help our floundering governments. The odd thing is that all the money that governments have access to is already digital, and in a sense imaginary: The European Financial Stability Facility, or the Bank of England’s latest round of quantitative easing, are just numbers in a computer.
There is not actually a giant pile of £50 billion worth of banknotes. However, the money that is causing problems is the real, physical stuff, which changes hands when builders or plumbers (or mafiosi) want to avoid their transactions being tracked, which means that tax-starved governments are missing out.
Do not think they have not noticed it, either. One of Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti’s first acts after coming into office was to announce the lowering of the ceiling for cash transactions to 300 euros. France is doing the same, pushing it down to 1,500 euros. That is why it is getting harder to get large cash amounts out of your bank: The expectation is that you are trying to do something illicit.
In the end, the rise of electronic transactions (now 70 percent by volume of high-street spending in the UK) may just be a matter of convenience: as our mobile phones and cards all go contactless, able to do transactions with a wave, we might find it simpler to go with them.
And the school lunches? We might still keep cash for them. By 2018, with inflation being what it is, British might be paying in £50 notes. At last they will have a legal use.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations