The pan-blues and the pan-greens have been stuck in a huge argument over how to help fruit farmers, who find themselves in a difficult situation that will take more than one election-cycle worth of campaign promises to fix. Nevertheless, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Tuesday demonstrated his concern by buying about 5,000kg of persimmons at a market using money from the state affairs fund. The money can be used at a president’s discretion, but the real question is whether Ma was acting as president, or as the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate.
While it does seem that those two positions (plus Ma as KMT chairman) are even more one and the same these days, it is a legally valid question. The two jobs are not inseparable, whatever the KMT may believe.
It would appear from the press coverage that it was Ma the candidate who was scooping up the tasty fruit, since he seemed more focused at taking potshots at his main rival, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), than promoting a comprehensive farm policy. If so, shouldn’t Ma have used his campaign office’s money to buy the fruit, since it didn’t really seem as if he was acting in his capacity as president? But then he couldn’t do that — since that might appear to be vote-buying.
Taiwan has grown accustomed to presidents using their special funds any which way they want, but look at what happened to Ma’s predecessor — or Ma himself with the Taipei mayor’s discretionary fund. It is time that clear — or clearer — lines are drawn when it comes to presidential spending, especially while on the campaign trail. It gives the incumbent an unfair advantage to have a (apparently) limitless source of discretionary funding. It is one thing to use these funds for hongbao (red envelopes containing cash) at weddings; it is another to be buying up bucket loads of fruit to score political points in a re-election bid.
This is not a persnickety question. It would be a valid question even if Ma had a resounding lead over Tsai because the nation has been reminded once again this week of the fickleness of the law when it comes to politicians and discretionary spending and budgetary responsibilities.
The same day Ma was picking persimmons, the Taiwan High Court upheld the Shilin District Court’s ruling that former National Palace Museum director Shih Shou-chien (石守謙) and 14 others were not guilty of corruption in relation to renovations to the museum’s main exhibition hall. The Shilin District Prosecutors’ Office had been asking for 15 years in prison for Shih.
The High Court found many mistakes in the prosecution’s indictment, citing a lack of sufficient evidence to have justified pursuing charges, and more worryingly, said some of the charges might have violated the law. The prosecutors can still appeal the verdict — like in a few recent cases involving officials of the former DPP government — to the Supreme Court, but given the High Court’s withering ruling, one would hope they wouldn’t.
It is looking more and more like many of the cases that the prosecutors have been pursuing with such vigor over the past three-and-a-half years are grounded in politics rather than in law, as many have long suspected. If true, that harkens back to the dark years of the former KMT administration, when political vendettas ran as rampant as political paranoia. If it is not true, then it looks like prosecutors nationwide all need to take refresher courses in evidentiary review processes.
Any way you look at it, the legal process appears in as dire straits as the fruit farmers. And while prosecutors are hitting their old textbooks and brushing up on what they have forgotten, they could be given a few persimmons to snack on. All that vitamin C should be good for the brain cells, while the persimmon purchases would help farmers.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under