“Do you feel it trickle down?” ask the protesters occupying Wall Street and parts of financial districts from London to San Francisco. They are not alone in their anxiety. Income inequality is a top concern not only in tent cities across the US, but also among street protesters in Taipei, Tel Aviv, Cairo, Athens, Madrid, Santiago and elsewhere.
Inequality almost everywhere, including China, has become so extreme that it must be reduced. Protesters, experts and center-left politicians agree on this — and on little else. The debate about inequality’s causes is complex and often messy; the debate about how to address it is messier still.
In the rich countries of the global north, the widening gap between rich and poor results from technological change, globalization and the misdeeds of investment bankers. In the not-so-rich countries of the south, much inequality is the consequence of a more old-fashioned problem: lack of employment opportunities for the poor.
In a forthcoming book, University of Chile economist Cristóbal Huneeus and I examine the roots of inequality in Chile and elsewhere in Latin America and come away with three policy prescriptions: jobs, jobs, jobs. In the last quarter-century, Chile managed to consolidate democracy, triple per capita income and achieve the highest living standards in Latin America, with near-universal coverage in healthcare, education and old-age pensions. Yet the gap in the labor incomes of rich and poor has barely budged.
In Chile and elsewhere, discussions of inequality tend to focus on how much people earn. According to national household surveys, a Chilean worker earning the minimum wage takes home US$300 a month, while a professional in the top 10 percent of the income scale typically makes about US$2,400 a month. -However, that eight-fold gap is only the tip of the inequality iceberg.
It also turns out that the poor worker lives in a household where only 0.5 people on average have a job, so that two families are needed for one steady source of income. By contrast, in the upscale professional’s household, nearly two people on average hold down a job.
Add to this several other differences — above all, poorer families’ higher fertility rates — and the sums reveal that the top 10 percent of households actually make 78 times more (on a per capita basis) than those at the bottom. That is the kind of figure that keeps Chile ranked high globally in terms of inequality, despite the country’s other achievements.
Put differently: Not only take-home pay, but also employment opportunities can be unequally distributed. Compound the two problems and you have world-class income disparities. Chile is hardly alone in this category. South Africa, another country that is proud of its exemplary -transition to democracy, suffers from the same problem in an even more extreme version. Within Latin America, Colombia and Brazil, among others, face a similar combination of low employment and high inequality.
The main victims of this state of affairs are women and the young, for whom employment ratios are much lower than for the population as a whole. A typical poor household in Chile and elsewhere in Latin America is headed by a woman with only primary-school education. She has small children, limited access to day care and few job opportunities.
That is the bad news — and it is very bad news indeed. The good news is that reducing inequality by creating jobs for the poor may prove to be faster than altering the entire structure of wages. Over the medium term, wages depend on productivity, which in turn depends crucially on higher-quality education and training for the poor, which Latin American countries certainly need. Indeed, a heated national debate about how to improve education has seized Chile for much of the past year.
Educational reforms, however urgent and important, take a long time to bear fruit, whereas changes in employment can reduce inequality more quickly — and the effects can be large. In our book, we estimate that if poor households in Chile had the same access to jobs as the middle classes enjoy, the gap between rich and poor would narrow by half.
So, what is the best way to create job opportunities for the poor? A growing economy with low inflation and financial stability is a necessary, but insufficient condition. Labor rules that favor job creation — what Scandinavian countries call active labor-market policies — are needed: A combination of information, training and subsidies that help overcome what are typically serious failures in the market for young workers with limited skills and experience.
The problem is more political than economic. In most Latin American countries, big business and labor have a long history of mutual distrust and getting them to agree on changes to labor-market rules is hardly an easy task. Moreover, many unemployed young people are not registered to vote, so providing jobs for them is hardly a top priority for the political establishment.
Equality through employment — not the snazziest of slogans, but one well worth painting on banners and flying over occupied squares and parks, on Wall Street and much farther afield.
Andres Velasco, a former finance minister of Chile, is a visiting professor at Columbia University until the end of next year.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations