Rising trade protectionism and frustration over its domestic subsidies spell trouble for China and could lead to more friction within the WTO than Beijing has grown accustomed to over the past decade.
On the eve of China’s accession to the WTO 10 years ago this December, naysayers warned that the country could falter under the demands of opening up its economy. Now there is little debate that it has been a boon in making China the world’s largest exporter and the second-largest trading nation.
However, China’s next decade in the trade group could be tougher. That is partly because while the country has opened many of its markets as required under the WTO rules, it still heavily subsidizes key industries.
State spending on clean technologies, which has already drawn ire from China’s trading partners, could continue rising after last week’s confirmation by Beijing of a massive investment plan for “strategic industries.”
That can only lead to increased friction as the global economy slows and countries scramble to boost exports.
“Some aspects of China’s economic system are fundamentally inconsistent with the market economy-based principles of the WTO,” said Wang Jiangyu (王江雨), a law professor and WTO expert at the National University of Singapore. “In the first few years, they [WTO members] could tolerate this, but as China’s trade grows you will see more and more cases against China.”
Experts say a recent WTO ruling that cheap state-supported financing and land give an unfair advantage might lead countries to resort to anti-subsidy cases against China — a trade weapon that aims at the heart of China’s state-backed economic model.
To date, WTO members have used anti-dumping cases to target China’s trade policies, which is relatively easy to do since China is still considered a “non-market” economy under the terms it negotiated in 2001. To build a case, another country can substitute China’s prices with those of another, pricier market economy.
The clause — which Beijing sees as unfair — expires in 2016.
However, a recent WTO decision said state involvement must be accounted for in bank financing, land prices and production input prices. That means the possible use of a similar tactic in anti-subsidy cases: Using higher third-country market rates and prices to show subsidized pricing.
In essence, China must still answer for its non-market economy subsidies past 2016.
Chin Leng Lim (陳倫林), a law professor at the University of Hong Kong, said challenging China on cheap land and financing — when the government owns all the land and banks — is more intrusive than going after unfairly underpriced goods. It is firing at the “Chinese mothership.”
“It’s about saying to China: ‘We don’t like the way you regulate and control your banks. We don’t like the way you regulate land. We don’t like the support you give to your state-owned enterprises. So change all of that,’” Chin said.
Anti-subsidy retaliation is already happening and “green” technology is a likely battlefield.
Early last month, the US government launched an investigation into imports of Chinese made solar panels after US solar companies called for anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties. In return, China’s commerce ministry said on Friday it was looking into US renewable energy subsidies.
“That’s what a trade war looks like, when it is tit-for-tat,” Chin said. “And it is all happening in and around anti-subsidy law.”
The man who negotiated China’s entrance into the WTO is worried about his country’s pledges to liberalize the economy.
“Essentially, after 10 years, it seems China is getting farther from the WTO,” Long Yongtu (龍永圖) said at a conference on the WTO anniversary in October.
WTO clashes are bound to rise, trade experts say, not only because trade rules are being used differently, but also because China’s goals have changed.
Scott Kennedy, director of Indiana University’s Research Center for Chinese Politics and Business, said now the priority of China’s leaders is boosting competitiveness by moving up the industrial value chain.
“That is a different mission than what Long Yongtu and his team were pushing for when they were pushing for liberalization to improve the Chinese economy,” Kennedy said in Beijing, where he is also visiting professor at the University of International Business and Economics.
During trade talks in Chengdu, China confirmed to US officials that Beijing plans to pour US$1.7 trillion into a number of strategic sectors in the coming five years.
While officials promised foreign firms would not be overlooked in the massive spending spree, foreign governments might see much of the investment as unfair subsidies for home-grown champions.
After a decade, the debate has come full-circle, and more of China’s exasperated trade partners are likely to head to the WTO dispute resolution system.
Lim said it is much like the debate before 2001, when they were deciding whether to allow a country that is not a free-market economy into the WTO.
“The counterargument to that was, how can you call it a world trade organization if China is not in it? So do we need to change China’s rules or do we need to change global rules to accommodate China?” he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs