Taiwan can consider itself fairly lucky. Its economic modernization was relatively pain-free and it is able to cope with the socio-economic changes brought on by such development, its political transition from authoritarian one-party state to a stable democracy was more or less peaceful and it has a strong and flourishing civil society that helps ensure the stability and vitality of its democracy.
What Taiwan might be most blessed with, however, is its geographical position, which has enabled it to serve US geopolitical interests for the past six decades. Early on in the Cold War, Taiwan was a useful link in the chain of countries along the Western Pacific stretching from Japan to Indonesia, serving as a bulwark against what the US deemed the “communist threat” to the “free” world. Then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) opposition to the Chinese Communist Party meant Taiwan was crucial to Washington’s attempts at containing Beijing’s propagation of revolution in Asia from the Korean War onward.
Today, the Cold War is no more, but to foreign policy and security hawks in Washington, China’s rising power is viewed as a threat to US supremacy in the Asia-Pacific region. Even the administration of US President Barack Obama, a “dove” by US standards, recently announced it would refocus its attention on the Asia-Pacific, not just to continue in areas of cooperation with Beijing, but, more importantly, to counter Chinese power by strengthening its political and security ties with countries in the region who view China’s increasingly aggressive posture with concern.
Once again, Taipei’s usefulness to the US will be renewed. Despite increasing calls by academics for the US to abandon Taiwan in the name of avoiding conflict with China, the US Congress would never allow this to happen. US lawmakers would dismiss such calls, saying that Washington should not appease an authoritarian regime by willfully selling out a democratic nation.
However, such claims by the US establishment that a democratic country should and would never be sold out must not be taken at face value by Taiwanese. It has never, nor will it ever, be Taiwan’s democracy and human rights that Washington comes to defend in the event of a conflict with China. It will solely be to maintain US dominance in this part of the world, for which Taiwan’s location in the Western Pacific allows. It was this strategic position, after all, that kept Chiang’s autocratic regime propped up for decades and maintained the gross fallacy that it represented a “free” China, not to mention undemocratic regimes in South Korea, the Philippines and Indonesia during that time.
So while the US Congress and right-wing think tanks, as of now, might have Taiwan’s back, it is important to keep in mind that their support will only last until something better suited to their strategic interests comes up.
When it comes to geopolitics, there is no such thing as a “true friend,” only strategic alliances.
Despite its advantageous location, Taiwan is caught between Beijing and Washington’s tug of war for supremacy in East Asia, which only reinforces the fact that Taipei has no genuine friends. Thus, it is all the more crucial for Taiwan to be united from within in the face of external challenges.
The intense partisan bickering Taiwan has seen since democratization has to stop, sooner rather than later, regardless of which camp wins the presidential and legislative elections in January. Taiwan cannot afford to depend on the whims of other countries to maintain stability — not the US, not Japan and most certainly not China.
Look no further than the US to see what it is like when the main parties run roughshod over a populace for partisan purposes and amplify the dysfunctional nature of a political system, grinding everything to a halt and fueling a country’s decline. Let it be a warning to the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party.
To many, unity might seem unattainable, but a strong sense of cohesion would bring focus to policy planning and development, and a way to move forward. And it is not just defense and security issues on which they would have a positive effect, but on social development as well.
A safe and confident society, one with a deep awareness of social justice, that adheres to equality in all forms, makes for a healthy and happy society. These are the things no other country could ever take away from Taiwan, even if it is sold out by its “friends.”
Ted Chang is a copy editor at the Taipei Times.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.