Farmers in other countries watching Taiwan’s political parties argue about prices of agricultural products are probably really impressed with our politicians and political parties, with their displays of concern for our farmers and how much they can get for their produce. Local politicians have been arguing over exactly how this or that type of persimmon should be classed, whether the prices quoted are market prices, wholesale prices or the cost at source, and whether it was worth selling the fruit at that price. There does not seem to be any aspect too trivial for them to fight over.
In one of its presidential campaign fliers, designed as a calendar showing the price of various fruits, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had the price of persimmons at about NT$2 per jin (600g). The point was to criticize the government’s agricultural policies and to suggest that it was indifferent to the plight of farmers and to finding a way to help them. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) responded angrily, saying that the DPP was hurting farmers for its own political gain and suggesting that if anything was worth such a paltry price, it was the DPP, not the persimmons. Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) joined in, accusing the DPP of riding roughshod over farmers and harming merchants and consumers alike.
However, the crux of the matter is not so much whether 600g of persimmons should be priced at NT$2, or where you can get them for that price, it is the problem of supply and demand for Taiwanese farm produce. If one is higher than the other, it will create problems for farmers. First it was bananas, then oranges and now persimmons. In all of these cases, the government has failed to come up with an effective system to regulate supply and demand by collecting relevant market data, managing gluts or shortfalls and providing assistance where needed. Every time the market price of a given commodity slumps, farmers find themselves unable to cover even the costs of harvesting or transporting the crop. The result is that the fruit is left rotting on the trees.
While the government and opposition are debating the problem, neither is offering any suggestions on how to address the core issue. They recently tried to score points off each other by wrangling over subsidy increases for elderly farmers, as if throwing a few more dollars the farmers’ way would miraculously solve all their problems. Actually, the best way to help farmers out would be for the government to help them overcome practical problems and stabilize their incomes. However much it then increased the subsidies would be no more than icing on the cake.
DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has proposed setting up an agricultural fund of NT$100 billion (US$3.29 billion) to provide financial assistance to farmers. The KMT has failed to come up with anything viable, despite Ma’s 2008 presidential campaign promise to ensure every farmer’s annual household income would exceed NT$1 million within his first term in office. Ma’s promise of a rose garden has turned out quite differently from the reality of orchards of rotting fruit, where farmers cannot sell their produce for more than a pittance.
The DPP’s criticism of the government’s indifference and Ma’s accusations that the DPP is harming farmers amount to little more than playing politics. The presidential candidates should at the very least be focusing on how these problems can be addressed. Farmers and farmers’ associations, who generally find it difficult to get their voices heard, have a real opportunity with this election to demand that the candidates offer some kind of practical solution. Once the election is over, they will have missed their moment, like Cinderella at the final stroke of midnight.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry