A year ago, it was a banned symbol of resistance. Now Burma’s most famous face is becoming ubiquitous in the capital: on trinkets, posters and newspaper front pages, the serene features of Aung San Suu Kyi are hard to avoid. And so is the impression that Burma is on the edge of something quite unexpected and unusual in these parts: Change.
After more than two decades of rule that has been by turns obstinate, cruel and surreal, the generals are showing tentative signs of reform.
Labor unions have been granted the right to strike. Some political prisoners have been released. An unpopular dam project on the Irrawaddy was suspended, the authorities preferring to annoy their Chinese paymasters rather than furious locals.
However, is Burma about to undergo a proper thaw after years of frosty diplomacy — or is it just a play by the generals to improve international relations at a time when they are short of cash and intimidated by the rise of their mighty northern neighbor?
Andrew Mitchell, the UK international development secretary and the first Cabinet minister from an EU country to visit in decades, told journalists on Thursday that the country was “making clear and immutable progress.”
“Aung San Suu Kyi is an inspiration and a personal hero to many across the world. It is an immense honor to have met her ... As I saw today on the visit we made to a school in Rangoon, she represents the hopes and dreams of Burma’s people,” Mitchell said.
“I am making this unprecedented visit because there are tentative — but real — signs of progress in Burma, which I welcome. But my message is clear: We need urgent further progress. I call upon the Burmese government to release all political prisoners, including Min Ko Naing, immediately; to ensure the coming by-elections are free and fair; and to take steps to end the conflict on Burma’s borders and strengthen respect for human rights and the rule of law. These actions would signal the way for a fundamental shift in the relationship between Burma and Britain,” Mitchell said.
Hundreds of people are still detained by the authorities, but there have been signs of an imminent release of prisoners in recent days. Burmese Minister of Labor Aung Kyi said the move would come “in the near future.” Earlier this week, Aung San Suu Kyi, who is considering a return to the political fray, expressed cautious hope about recent progress.
Reform hopes have centered on the figure of Burmese President Thein Sein, in power since March, a moderate who consented to a meeting with Aung San Suu Kyi in August. Burmese in the capital generally speak well of a president whom many believe did not want the job, seeing him as a figure of compromise and relative honesty, with an aim of modernizing his moribund country. The president speaks of wanting to move Burma toward a “disciplined, flourishing democracy.”
U Win Tin, a founding member of Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy, said: “There are really two governments in this country; the government of Thein Sein and then the military.”
He pointed to Thein Sein’s much-applauded speeches to parliament promising “clean government” and peace with ethnic armed groups, while the military waged war against ethnic rebel groups.
Others trust the leadership still less. Newly released labor activist Su Su New said: “The government doesn’t follow the law; that’s why there are a lot of problems.”
Thein Sein’s military proxy party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party, rigged last year’s election and took up the majority of seats in the country’s two national parliaments.
Still, legislative reforms have been passed and include a labor organization bill that gives Burmese the right to strike and unionize for the first time since the 1960s. A “massive” step, according to Steve Marshall, the International Labour Organisation’s Rangoon liaison officer.
“Our labor can organize according to their will,” Burmese Deputy Minister of Labor U Myint Thein said. “It will bring benefits to the economy.”
The president has made overtures to the West and reform-minded elites, promising human rights progress and market-orientated economics. Changes have included an easing of censorship, reform of electoral laws, privatizations and calls for exiles to return.
U Myint Thein said: “Already we have changed, now the West should respond.”
Part of the leadership’s motivation for change could be economic. Sanctions and international isolation left Burma solely in the orbit of China, especially with regard to loans.
Professor Shujie Yao of the University of Nottingham said that, in the face of China, “many countries are fearing for their sovereignty, even Japan.”
“We need new friends,” Burmese economist Khin Maung Nyo said. “We have two problems: a lack of funds and also the government should manage funds effectively and wisely.”
Burma’s debt has been growing fast and its currency is unstable.
“Officially US$1 is equal to six kyat, but in practice it’s 800 or 900 kyat to the dollar,” Khin Maung Nyo said.
Some allege this is a part of a broader scam to hide revenues.
The government spends about 23 percent of GDP on the military, yet only 1 percent on education and 1 percent on health, causing what Paul Whittingham, head of the Burma section of the Department for International Development, describes as a “crisis in healthcare.”
Another legislative move has involved a re-examination of laws for protest. Four years ago, protests led by Burmese monks were brutally crushed. Parliament is now drafting laws that allow protesters to peacefully “process” if they remain silent. Slogans may be carried only if pre-approved.
Mindful of the startling change in the Arab world, popular revolt is a matter of serious concern to the generals. Last week, a small group of monks in Mandalay persisted with a public rally to demand prisoner releases.
More dramatic still was the outcome from a grassroots movement against the Myitsone dam being built by the Chinese on the Irrawaddy. The dam would have flooded an area the size of Singapore and destroyed fisheries and infrastructure downriver. Ninety percent of the energy generated was to go to China, while the cash generated would have disappeared into the dark recesses of the junta’s inscrutable financial ledger. Not surprisingly, locals revolted, with bomb attacks and “save the Irrawaddy” messages plastered on the walls of towns and cities, even Rangoon.
On the streets of Rangoon, the people wait for change.
“We hope things are moving, slow and steady,” said one wistful teacher who did not want to be named. “Maybe.”
Editor’s note: The Guardian newspaper prefers to retain the designations Burma and Rangoon when writing about the country.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs