It has been suggested that the US should stop defending democratic Taiwan from China’s military in return for the cancelation of the US$1.14 trillion in US debt that Beijing holds. That so harebrained a scheme made it onto the op-ed page of the New York Times on Nov. 10 shows that there are those who subscribe wholeheartedly to the myth that with China looming ever larger on the horizon, Taiwan is assuming less of a strategic importance. Nothing could be further from the truth.
That China is on course to becoming a superpower is not the issue at all. The issue is that if this super-powerful China of tomorrow thinks and acts anywhere near the way it does today, it is on a collision course with the interests of the rest of the world — and, as we are already beginning to see today, in such a situation the rest of the world could very easily come out the loser.
China does not play by the same rules as everybody else. It cheats on everything, bullies everybody and demands that everyone accept the lies it peddles as truth.
Chinese Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) languishes in jail — as do many of China’s noblest spirits who have dared to fight illegally polluted lakes, censorship, official corruption, and the like.
The line we hear from China’s leaders, not too different from that uttered by dictators everywhere, is that these reformers and protesters are seeking to impose alien ideas and norms that have no place in Chinese society or culture. Taiwan’s existence as a free-market economy, thriving democracy and two-party political system — a sovereign and independent Chinese republic whose people enjoy all the basic human rights and freedoms as those who live in the US or Western Europe — demonstrates that the rhetoric of the Chinese Communist Party is a lie and points the way for an alternative approach to the development of China. For this reason, Taiwan matters.
It is very much in the world’s and in the US’ strategic interest to protect Taiwan’s right to determine its own destiny. Whether Taiwan becomes part of China or not is much less important than ensuring any such decision is made by Taiwanese alone. This is a scenario that China fears even more than Taiwanese independence — that an example might be made and the idea might spread to the far-flung corners of the People’s Republic of China — that power can, should and deserves to come from the people themselves. This is an idea that needs to be embraced if the culture, economy and political system of a future Chinese superpower is to more closely resembles that of a global leader. Only then can Beijing hope to be a partner and friend to the US rather than simply a more powerful, selfish and conniving adversary than it is today.
In this scenario Taiwan’s strategic importance is out of all proportion to its size and the marginal international role it plays today. Like a catalyst, Taiwan has the power to change everything around it.
In this context, the idea of ditching Taiwan for money is absurd. By allowing the idea to be aired in a public forum, the New York Times did us all a wonderful service by showing the festering depths of economic determinism that have corrupted the US.
Were the US to ditch Taiwan, it would be ditching just about the only thing it has left — its core values. Because of the narrow-minded focus on material gain on the part of more than a few, the US has already ditched its own economic future and that of the free world, not to mention the future of the promising young men and women pouring out of its universities and universities everywhere. It has thrown away jobs and with them its competitive edge in so many manufacturing technologies, and even done away with the pretense that it is a real democracy, as the bankers it bailed out spend billions of dollars of public money handed over meekly by elected officials in pursuit of their own selfish interests.
It is time Americans as a whole stood back and took a look at their currency. The faces on it are those of the founding fathers and former presidents George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and Abraham Lincoln. The vision of these men, not money, is what made the US great. This is a vision that demands the US helps not just the disenfranchised and downtrodden in China and elsewhere in the world, but also those at home, as represented by the demands of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
In Asia, Taiwan stands in a unique way for everything the US’ founding fathers believed in and it deserves US support, today and in the future.
William Stimson is an American writer who has lived in Taiwan for nine years.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs