The story about former minister of agriculture and current Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) vice presidential candidate Su Jia-chyuan’s (蘇嘉全) purchase of farmland and construction of a “farmhouse” seems to have run its course. Both those accusing Su and those defending him are concentrating solely on the legality of the issue and whether it constitutes an abuse of power.
However, this is hardly the point, as it would be better to debate the policy side of things in the lead up to the presidential election. We should be asking whether the DPP, if it wins the election, would continue to apply the Agricultural Development Act (農業發展條例), allowing farmland to be sold to people who are not farmers and for “farmhouses” to be constructed on that land.
Up until now, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has avoided asking these two questions. This is because the previous KMT administration passed an amendment to that act that brought to a close the era of exclusive ownership and use of farmland for farmers. As a consequence, many members of both the governing and opposition parties have bought farmland on which they plan to put a “farmhouse,” if they haven’t done so already.
Pricing land in Taiwan purely based on the value of agricultural yield would not make it worth selling. The relaxing of rules over the exclusive agricultural use of farmland was originally done to help the farmers who owned the land. However, there were still some fundamental contradictions inherent in the policies governing the deregulation of land use. How, for example, is a person who is not a farmer and purchases farmland supposed to ensure it remains available for agricultural use?
Currently, the market price for farmland is derived from the value of “farmhouses” and of any illegal factories built on it. The way to resolve this is to take any farmland unsuitable for agricultural purposes and put it to different and more efficient use, as long as it is legal and not harmful to the environment. The profit derived from this change of land use could then be used to subsidize land that would be able to contribute positively to food security.
The Council of Agriculture classes 300,000 hectares of farmland in Taiwan as “premium,” representing 12 percent of the 2.5 million hectares of agricultural land in the wider definition, or a third of the close to 900,000 hectares classified as arable land. Implementing measures based on finding this balance of profit and loss is the only approach that makes any real sense.
The amendments made to the Agricultural Development Act prior to the 2000 election were the result of a compromise between the government and the opposition, but they contained the internal contradictions mentioned above. Peng Tso-kwei (彭作奎), chairman of the Council of Agriculture at the time, resigned because of these changes, knowing full well that they were unworkable, although he failed to propose a more viable alternative policy.
There was a vigorous debate over agricultural development policy by government officials and academics at the time, but they have chosen not to raise the issue again during this latest scandal. Self-interest is at play here. Politicians across the spectrum are unwilling to bring up the subject of “farmhouses” because they have no idea how far things would go if they pursue the issue, and how much it might affect their own election prospects.
In the run-up to the election I imagine we are going to hear a lot about who “loves Taiwan” and who is “selling out” Taiwan. It is funny how these parties love the land of Taiwan so much, but have yet to come up with an effective agricultural land policy.
Hua Chang-i is a retired professor.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China