In August, the European balance-of-payments crisis moved beyond the eurozone’s periphery and began buffeting Italy. Interest spreads for Italian government bonds began to rise and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s administration was alarmed enough to implement an austerity program, while the European Central Bank (ECB) helped with extra liquidity.
The ECB directed the central banks of all eurozone members to buy huge quantities of Italian government bonds during the crisis. While the national central banks have not revealed how much they bought, the aggregate stock of all government bonds purchased rose from 74 billion euros (US$102 billion) on Aug. 4 to 165 billion euros this month. Most of this increase was probably used to purchase Italian government bonds.
The German Bundesbank, which was forced to buy most of the bonds, strongly opposed the program, but was unable to stop it. In response, ECB Chief Economist Juergen Stark resigned. He followed former Bundesbank president Axel Weber, who had resigned in February because of the earlier bond repurchases. Meanwhile, new Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann openly objects to the program, while German President Christian Wulff has publicly accused the ECB of circumventing the Maastricht Treaty.
However, the bond purchases are just the tip of the iceberg. Equally important, but largely unknown, is the fact that the Banca d’Italia has resorted to the printing press to cover Italy’s gigantic balance of payments deficit. The extra money printing and lending, as measured by the so-called Target deficit, effectively means drawing a credit from the ECB.
This credit replaces the private capital imports that had hitherto financed the country’s net purchases of foreign goods, but which dried up because of the crisis and it finances a capital flight, ie, the purchase of foreign assets.
The ECB in turn draws the Target credit from the respective national central banks to which the money is flowing and which therefore has to accept a reduction in its scope for issuing refinancing credit.
Until July, only Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain had drawn Target credit, for a combined total of 330 billion euros. Italy was stable and did not seem to need the printing press to solve its financial problems. No longer.
highest target loan
In August alone, Italy’s central bank drew 40 billion euros in Target credit and it probably drew roughly another 50 billion euros last month, when the Bundesbank’s Target loans to the ECB system increased by 59 billion euros (after a 47 billion euros increase in August). This is the highest Target loan ever drawn from the Bundesbank in a single month and in all likelihood it went primarily to Italy.
This is an explosion in slow motion. The stock of overall Target credit that the ECB system has drawn from the Bundesbank was about zero until mid-2007. By the end of last month, it had climbed to 450 billion euros — in addition to the purchases of government bonds that the Bundesbank has been forced to make.
As Italy’s monthly current account deficit approximates only 3 billion to 4 billion euros, the Target credit must have compensated primarily for capital flight. Italian investors sold their assets to the banking system, which paid with newly printed money. The investors then invested the proceeds in Germany, buying shares, bonds and other assets. In essence, Germany and Italy traded Target claims against marketable assets.
Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain’s collective draw on Target credits forced the Bundesbank to reduce the refinancing credit that it issued by about 30 billion euros per year from 2008 to the end of last year, when it stood at barely 90 billion euros. At that rate, it was predicted that the level could fall to zero within the next three years.
However, the Italian Target credit has now exceeded that estimate. Last month, the Bundesbank’s stock of refinancing loans, net of its deposit facilities vis-a-vis German banks, turned negative for the first time in history. The ECB’s shifting of refinancing credit via the Target system has therefore already hit the limit, three years earlier than the trend of the past three years would have suggested.
This is not the end of the world, not even for the ECB, but the Bundesbank has entered a new regime in which it will have to borrow extensively from the private banking sector to absorb the flight money from the crisis countries. They, in turn, will continue to compensate for capital flight by cranking up the money-printing press.
With this, the eurozone has entered dangerous territory. Deposit facilities count as central bank money and have inflationary potential, given that the German banks could withdraw those funds at any time. If they do, more than the Target balances could be exploding in Europe.
Hans-Werner Sinn is a professor of economics and public finance at the University of Munich in Germany and president of the Ifo Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo just dropped the other shoe in the White House’s multidimensional response to the hydra-headed existential challenge from communist China. Yet his sweeping address at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum on Thursday was the most powerful yet — a virtual declaration of a new cold war and a call for global delegitimization of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rule through what amounts to regime change. Although he did not explicitly mention either a cold war or regime change — terms that send shudders through the foreign policy establishment — Pompeo made it clear that
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly