Mon, Oct 24, 2011 - Page 9 News List

Obama’s foreign successes may not help his campaign

By Charles Babington  /  AP, Washington

By declaring the Iraq war over, US President Barack Obama scored what his allies see as a fourth big foreign policy success in six months, starting with Osama bin Laden’s killing. However, these events might play a discouragingly small role in his re-election bid, even if they burnish his eventual place in history.

US voters tend to focus heavily on domestic issues, especially in times of high unemployment. That will limit Obama’s campaign options.

His supporters are seeking ways to make the most of his foreign policy accomplishments. One approach is to contrast them with Congress’ partisan-driven gridlock on taxes, the deficit and other domestic issues.

“Look at the progress the president can make when he doesn’t have Republicans obstructing him,” said former Democratic spokeswoman Karen Finney, who often defends the party on TV or radio.

Former Democratic strategist Rebecca Kirszner Katz made a similar remark on Twitter last week: “Terrorists and dictators, lacking the filibuster, have no effective defense against Barack Obama.”

It referred to the stalling tactic that Senate Republicans frequently use to kill Democratic bills even though they hold only 47 of the chamber’s 100 seats.

These Democrats hope Americans will see a bold and capable president who keeps his promises when Republicans do not create roadblocks. They note that he green-lighted a daring nighttime raid to kill bin Laden in Pakistan on May 1; approved policies that led to last month’s drone-missile killing of US-born terror advocate Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen; backed allied actions that led to former Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi’s ouster and death; and ended US involvement in Iraq on schedule.

“It is very important for any incumbent to be able to talk about promises made and promises kept,” Finney said.

The list of achievements, contrasted with former US president George W. Bush’s erroneous claims about Iraq’s weaponry in the first place, should help Democrats shake their image of being the weaker party on national security, she said.

“That baggage is finally lifted,” Finney said.

Translating that claim into votes for Obama 13 months from now may be difficult, however. The latest Associated Press-GfK poll confirmed that Americans still place far greater emphasis on domestic issues, especially the economy, than on foreign matters, including the “war on terrorism.”

The poll found Obama’s overall approval rating at an all-time low, 46 percent, for the second straight month, even though 64 percent of adults approved of his handling of terrorism. Only 40 percent approved of his handling of the economy.

Ninety-three percent of respondents said the economy was an extremely or very important issue. By comparison, 73 percent put the same emphasis on terrorism.

Democratic officials believe Obama’s foreign policy record will look even better when the Republican presidential candidates hold a debate on that topic on Nov. 15. Leading contenders Mitt Romney and Rick Perry are current or former governors, and Herman Cain has never held public office, so none has extensive foreign policy experience.

However, voters routinely accept that. In recent presidential elections, they have chosen governors from Georgia, California, Arkansas and Texas, plus a first-term senator, Obama.

On Friday, Romney and Perry criticized Obama’s handling of Iraq. Some Democrats found Romney’s remarks unusually harsh.

This story has been viewed 2547 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top