Not long ago, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said: “Taiwan is the Republic of China [ROC] and the Republic of China is Taiwan.” That statement set off an exchange of criticism between the pan-blue and pan-green camps.
Some pro-independence activists said Tsai can say whatever she wants and that they will say whatever they want, but what really matters is that when added together, they will win the presidential election.
Others said her statement is a description of the “status quo,” and that it is very different from the ROC of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Still others are opposed to the national title “ROC,” insisting that it be changed to the “Republic of Taiwan.”
Pro-independence activist Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏) even ran newspaper advertisements on Oct. 13 attacking Tsai for legitimizing and legalizing the ROC.
Pro-blue supporters have entered the debate, saying Tsai’s recognition of the ROC was the green camp’s gift to the nation’s centennial celebrations.
The blue camp also said the green camp’s compromise on this important issue could put an end to infighting, that it looks forward to her next step and that her position can relieve the conflict between the pro-unification and pro--independence sides.
Others said the public will have greater expectations of the DPP if it were to include this position in its party platform and push for a “Taiwan consensus” on this basis in an attempt to seek reconciliation with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and various sectors in Taiwanese society.
The truth is that Tsai’s ROC is completely different from Ma’s. In addition, her position does not override the DPP’s 1999 Resolution on Taiwan’s Future.
Actually, it is an extension of former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) 2005 “four-stage theory” of the ROC: the ROC in China; the ROC moving to Taiwan; the ROC in Taiwan; the ROC is Taiwan.
Since Ma came to power more than three years ago, Taiwan’s sovereignty has been jeopardized. In particular, Shanghai Institute of East Asian Studies director Zhang Nianchi (章念馳) published an article in this month’s issue of the Hong Kong-based China Review magazine, saying that the process of unification was started during Ma’s term.
On Oct. 17, Ma responded by proposing a potential “cross-strait peace agreement,” to be signed some time during the next decade.
Under such circumstances, why should the pro-independence camp continue to restrict itself to the national title issue and make statements that are not beneficial to the overall situation?
I believe Tsai and the DPP would never sell out Taiwan, and opinion poll results show that 72 percent of respondents agree that the center-leaning DPP should defeat the pro-China KMT to avoid unification and save Taiwan’s sovereignty from the current crisis.
In future, perhaps a party could be established to push for independence or a change in the national title and to monitor the DPP to see that it accomplishes these ultimate goals.
At the Northern Taiwan Society’s 10th anniversary fundraising party on July 23, Chen said in his written greeting that “independence is not yet completed, all my comrades must struggle on.”
The word “comrades” here refers to all the supporters of independence and a change in the national title.
The fight against unification is currently the most urgent task.
Independence is a future mission that can be completed gradually.
Kuo Chang-feng is a physician.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry