So much for repeated pledges of social justice.
The so-called “raise” in the monthly subsidy for elderly farmers announced by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Tuesday comes across as nothing more than blatant discrimination against the nation’s farmers.
At a press conference he presided over on Tuesday, Ma announced the Executive Yuan’s proposed raise in the farmers’ subsidy, saying it plans to increase the monthly subsidy to NT$6,316 from the current NT$6,000.
Pending legislative approval, the raise, with an “anti-rich” clause attached, would be adjusted every four years in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), Ma said.
In a speech that stressed fairness and social justice, Ma appeared to pride himself on having achieved this. However, while he said that the Executive Yuan also plans to increase the subsidies for another eight groups — including the elderly, the disabled and low-income families — in accordance with the CPI, the truth is that the proposal is anything but fair and even downright insulting.
First, does the Ma administration really expect to soothe farmers with its proposed raise of NT$316 a month? That translates to less than NT$11 a day — a sum of money too small to even purchase a packet of instant noodles. Does Ma expect the farmers to feed themselves by buying 316 jin (190kg) of bananas with their NT$316?
The government is doing no more than throwing the farmers a breadcrumb, highlighting in what low regard it holds the nation’s farmers.
As Ma himself noted, the NT$316 increase reflects the 5.27 percent average increase in the CPI over the past four years. Therefore, the NT$316 is not a raise per se, but a mere readjustment on the basis of CPI fluctuations.
While Ma might stress how he has attended to the notion of fairness by implementing subsidy adjustments according to the CPI for the other eight disadvantaged groups, if the president truly cared for the disadvantaged, he would address each of their problems separately, not lump them together with one “quick fix” solution and present it, falsely, as “fairness.”
And why the anti-rich clause? When the Ma administration introduced a 3 percent pay raise for the nation’s civil servants in July — Ma included, as the head of state — there was no mention of an anti-rich clause, nor was such a clause attached to the elite group enjoying an 18 percent preferential interest rate on their savings.
And let us not forget that from January, the nation’s retired military veterans will receive an increase of NT$600 on their monthly pensions — to a total of NT$14,150 a month.
While officials from the Ma administration argue that the proposed raise for farmers is more than fair, as both civil servants and retired veterans will receive comparable raises, it is not fair that each of the raises is based on a different basic figure to begin with.
Many might conclude that the Ma government’s proposed increase of NT$316 in farmers’ monthly subsidy exposes not only a deep lack of respect and regard for the nation’s farmers, but also suggests that the government itself is guilty of accelerating the widening gap between the nation’s rich and poor.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.