Last week was Senior Citizens’ Day and we were once more treated to the sight of politicians heading to designated places and going through the charade of handing out red envelopes to the elderly in a demonstration of how much they respect them and care about them. It is a shame that politicians do not instead put their minds to addressing the structural challenges faced by the elderly in Taiwan and try to make more age-friendly policies.
From a gerontological perspective, the main problems that the elderly face today are related to how the state and society define them and how they shape the everyday experiences of individual senior citizens.
Put more succinctly, the fundamental problem the 2.5 million elderly people in this country face is that the state and society consistently view them as a problem, believing them to be a drag on economic development and contributors to a larger dependent population — and therefore a burden on society.
Experts in the field say an aging population could lead to considerable increases in expenditure on healthcare, insurance and welfare, wreaking havoc on the nation’s finances and eventually bankrupting the country.
The logical extension of the assumption that “elderly” equals “problematic” is that the aging population is a time bomb that will lead to the collapse of the state and society, which has led to a type of panic among the public. That, though, is quite an accusation to level at the aged.
The population is aging. Society is already on this trajectory and there is nothing we can do about it. What we should do is embrace the situation with open arms and a positive attitude. If we don’t, the population’s increasing life expectancy is little more than a sick joke on society.
The WTO has pointed out that the aging population — the result of people living longer than ever before — represents a great victory for humanity, the foremost success story of public health policy and social and economic development. It is at once the great achievement of the 20th century and one of the biggest challenges emerging for the 21st.
People have traditionally associated old age with illness and reliance on others, but it does not have to be like this, certainly not nowadays. We need to frame the debate anew: Elderly people are not a drain on the economy, they are active participants in it; they are both contributors to development and beneficiaries of it.
As early as a decade ago, the WTO proposed an “active aging” policy framework, extending opportunities for the elderly in terms of health, participation and security, and improving their quality of life.
Yes, it is true that an aging population could increase the cost of healthcare, but according to research carried out by countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the main reasons for increasing costs are inefficient healthcare delivery services, misdirected investment in infrastructure, the misallocation of expenditure and the inappropriate use of high-cost technologies.
It is not the aging population in itself that could lead to a country’s finances spiraling out of control.
Taiwan has also bought into the active aging concept, although the responsibility and emphasis has been placed more on the shoulders of the senior citizens themselves and largely ignores the role that ought to be played by the government. Compared with the youth, who are more active and mobile, the elderly tend to stay in one place and so they are the people who take care of the local area. Any active aging policy ought to consist of creating a living environment conducive to senior citizens.
The UN released a Global Age-Friendly Cities Guide to coincide with the 2007 International Day of Older Persons. The guide looked at facilities, buildings, the urban environment and transportation, and consolidates the areas of welfare, medical treatment, health insurance, assistive devices, insurance and architecture with the provision of the required infrastructure, systems and financial planning. Individual cities were evaluated for how age-friendly they are based on a checklist, including factors such as a pleasant and clean environment, green spaces, adequate lighting, places to rest, sidewalks, intersections, accessibility, safety, promenades, bike lanes, elevators, stairs, ramps, entrances, thoroughfares, non-slippery surfaces, sunlight, medical treatment and entertainment facilities.
At present, Chiayi City is really the only place in Taiwan taking steps to create an age-friendly environment. Very few other cities currently have a comprehensive plan. Cities such as Taipei, New Taipei City (新北市) and Greater Kaohsiung, which have a large elderly population, and Chiayi, Yunlin and Penghu counties, which have a high percentage of elderly people, still have much to do to promote age-friendly facilities.
The Council for Economic Planning and Development predicts that the aging of Taiwan’s population is really going to take off in 10 years’ time and, within the next four decades, the aging index will be 5.71 times what it is today, making it the fastest-aging population in the world. In as little as 22 years, Taiwan is expected to overtake Japan as the world’s oldest population.
The aging of our population is unavoidable. We cannot continue to regard senior citizens as problems. We must assess and act on the opportunities and challenges that the aging population presents to Taiwan, today and over the next few decades.
Chiou Tian-juh is a professor of social psychology at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.