After President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) failed to deliver on his “6-3-3” campaign promise — 6 percent economic growth, per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of below 3 percent — it is common knowledge that his election promises are worthless.
To everyone’s surprise, when a journalist asked Ma about the results of his “4-6-8” plan not long ago, he couldn’t even remember the name of the plan and said he would have to check. Clearly he did not remember promising during his 2008 election campaign to provide tax refunds of up to NT$46,800 as a job subsidy for low-income households with incomes.
The campaign promises a popularly elected president makes represent a solemn pledge to voters. However, Ma not only makes little effort to fulfil his promises, he often ignores them altogether.
One example is the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the opaqueness of which raised a lot of questions, resulting in demands for a referendum on the issue. However, Ma blocked such proposals and would not even allow KMT legislators to review the agreement, despite its huge legislative majority.
Other campaign promises that Ma does not really care about, such as the “4-6-8” plan, he conveniently forgot after winning the election. During the 2008 campaign he promised that the government would continue to seek UN membership, in line with the wishes of Taiwanese. After becoming president, that promise was forgotten as attempts to gain UN membership as a state were replaced by a push for a “diplomatic truce” with China.
Ma pledged that Taiwan’s future would be decided by Taiwanese without any interference from China, but after coming to power he has pushed the “1992 consensus” with Beijing and said that Taiwan is part of China, thus depriving the Taiwanese of their right to decide.
When running for party chairman and president, Ma repeatedly said he would resolve the problem of the KMT’s ill-gotten assets. However, he has simply sold off the party’s assets cheaply in one questionable deal after another that even members of the Central Standing Committee were not told about. Recently exposed kickbacks paid in connection to these sales have further highlighted Ma’s deception. The only thing about which he seems to be genuinely sincere is his belief in the “one China” principle and his efforts to lock Taiwan onto China in pursuit of “eventual unification.”
As he campaigns for re--election, Ma is now making another set of promises. Who can believe anything he says? More than a month ago, his campaign spokesman Yin Wei (殷瑋) was unable to name the “12 Loving Taiwan Projects” that Ma proposed on a TV talk show. It has long been thought that Ma’s assistants don’t take his promises seriously, but the “4-6-8” debacle shows that not even Ma himself takes them seriously
Do the pan-blue camp’s heavyweights continue to support him for the sake of KMT rule? Do deceived swing voters want to be deceived again? Above all, first-time voters should not trust his campaign promises, which are even bigger this time around.
Despite failing to deliver on the “6-3-3” pledge, Ma is undeterred in his promises.
He continues to equivocate over a pledge to donate half his salary if he fails to deliver on the original promise. Presidential Office spokesman Fan Chiang Tai-chi (范姜泰基) said on Oct. 4 that Ma had donated more than NT$70 million to charity over the years.
This excuse only serves to further highlight Ma’s ignorance about political accountability. He has said that what is important is that he continues to strive to achieve his election promises, rather than whether he donates half his salary.
Despite failing to fulfill his promises, Ma is now asking the public to give him four more years in office, offering an even more grandiose promise of a “golden decade.”
Perhaps he should declare martial law — that way he could take responsibility for the failure of the “6-3-3” pledge by remaining president indefinitely.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs