Charles Darwin would appreciate the irony of Yasuni National Park in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Yasuni, home to one of the highest concentrations of biodiversity in the world, is itself engaged in what Darwin called “the struggle for existence.” A proposed drilling project in Yasuni’s Ishpingo--Tambococha-Tiputini (ITT) oilfields would tap into a reservoir estimated to be worth more than US$10 billion — and permanently destroy this global treasure.
Darwin, who developed his theory of evolution in Ecuador’s famous Galapagos Islands, recognized the importance of the relationships between species. He observed that no species — including humans — can exist in isolation from other living things. Each organism relies on natural processes to survive and contributes to nature’s balance — and ultimately, to the survival of all life on our planet.
Yet in Yasuni, a tragic tradeoff between man and the environment looms.
Amid the richness of the Ecuadorian Amazon, one-third of the country’s population lives below the poverty line. For many Ecuadorians, the economic opportunity beneath Yasuni — equivalent to about one-fifth of Ecuador’s proven oil reserves — raises a painful choice between biodiversity and wealth. Understandably, many would choose to drill. Indeed, in 2007, crude and refined oil products accounted for more than half of Ecuador’s export revenue.
However, extracting the more than 800 million barrels of crude oil under Yasuni and burning the fuels made from that oil would lead to more than 400 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, equal to the annual carbon footprint of Brazil. The resulting deforestation would add another 800 million tonnes to the atmosphere’s carbon burden, an amount equal to what Germany emits each year. And the permanent damage to thousands of species — and to the indigenous Amazonian Tagaeri and Taromenane tribes, which remain isolated from the world — would be too profound to quantify.
The discovery beneath Yasuni has sparked a heated debate, but a majority of Ecuadorians still prefer to leave the oil in the ground and the Yasuni intact, despite the financial sacrifices that this implies. A novel “Plan A,” announced in 2007 by Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa, would prevent oil extraction in Yasuni if money could be raised from the international community to offset some of the economic losses that would result from a drilling ban.
The UN responded to Ecuador’s plan and last year established a special fund for the initiative, the Yasuni ITT Trust Fund. The UN Development Programme (UNDP) administers the fund and an independent steering committee oversees its operations. The fund’s goal now is to raise US$3.6 billion from foreign governments, private companies and individuals over the next 13 years. By urging the international community to provide less than half of the possible revenue, Ecuador and the UNDP are hoping to promote a spirit of global responsibility for Yasuni’s preservation.
A drilling ban in Yasuni would have tremendous benefits for both Ecuador and the world. The funds raised from the initiative would be invested in Ecuador’s alternative-energy industry, with the goal of changing the country’s entire energy matrix. The eventual returns from the new energy systems would then be invested in social and environmental programs.
Moreover, contributors to the UNDP-administered Yasuni ITT Trust Fund will be given Yasuni Guarantee Certificates (CGYs), a legally recognized financial instrument that requires Ecuador’s government to repay the face value of the contributions if the fund is not successful. With this plan, Ecuador would emerge as an international model for sustainable energy policy.
The trust fund seeks US$100 million by the end of this year. If this amount is not raised, the call for drilling will be almost unstoppable. The international community must not let this happen.
We need to recognize, as Darwin did, that there are profound interconnections among all living things. Each of us is dependent on a vast array of plants, animals and microbes, and the life-giving services they provide.
Yasuni’s enormous biodiversity will lead to new medicines and medical-research models to treat human diseases and relieve human suffering — but only if it wins its struggle for survival. It will if we recognize that Yasuni does not belong just to Ecuador, but to all of us, and that it is our responsibility to protect it for all time.
Eric Chivian, who shared the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize, is the founder and director of the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School. Rigoberta Menchu is a Guatemalan activist for the rights of indigenous people and a winner of the 1992 Nobel Peace Prize. For more information on how to save Yasuni-ITT, visit www.yasunisupport.org.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations