Although Taiwan has been colonized before, it is now an independent entity and has never once been a province of China (“Ascertaining the status of Taiwan” Sept. 27, page 8). The Republic of China (ROC) has been squatting in Taiwan since 1949 after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) fled from China.
The feud and conflict across the Taiwan Strait is about the existence of two Chinas and not about Taiwan. Many people, businesses, travelers, governments and politicians alike have been referring to Taiwan as the ROC, which is wrong. It should be called the ROC on Taiwan. It is because of this convenient moniker that “Taiwan is the ROC” that has given the People’s Republic of China (PRC) the opportunity to claim sovereignty over Taiwan.
Sometimes names can be the same, but when there are border disputes, it is never a good idea — in this case, the ROC and PRC. Two neighboring Chinas implies they belong together and share a common identity.
This is much the same reason why Greece objects to the name “Macedonia” for the country that formed out of the former Yugoslavia. Greece would not have objected to a name like “Western Bulgaria” (given most of its inhabitants used to freely self-identify as ethnic Bulgarians prior to the Yugoslavians’ renaming the region), or Vardar, or any other number of names that do not attempt to insinuate that its own Macedonia region belongs to a neighboring state.
The office of the provincial governor of Taiwan, which was created by the KMT, had indicated that Taiwan was a province, but a province of which country? Fortunately, that administration was streamlined in the late 1990s, with People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) serving as the last governor.
So you see, it is the many fallacies that politicians and government officials perpetuate by referring to Taiwan as the “ROC,” when they actually mean the ROC (not Taiwan), that has allowed Beijing to make its sovereignty claim over Taiwan, which is illegal.
Anyone should know that the tenant does not own the property.
Andrew Michael Teo
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose