It has taken almost half a decade, but the area in Taipei now known as Huashan 1914 Creative Park appears to be well on its way to being the crucible for the performing, creative and experimental arts that so many have long envisioned.
It is not quite there yet, and it may be more commercial and regimented than some artists like, but the park has obviously struck the right tone with Taipei residents and tourists, as a visit on almost any weekend, and even some weeknights, will attest.
The site started life as the Taipei Winery in 1916. Ownership then passed to the Taiwan Tobacco and Wine Monopoly Bureau after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took over Taiwan. In 1987, the winery relocated and its buildings sat boarded up and deserted for a decade as developers salivated over the property and the central government debated what to do, having originally earmarked the site for a new Legislative Yuan.
Who knows how long the buildings would have sat derelict — or if they would have survived — if the Golden Bough Theatre had not staged an intervention of sorts by taking over one of the buildings to stage the play Trojans amid demands that the government allow idle buildings and sites to be used for cultural activities. The police broke up the show and the government accused the group of illegally appropriating state property, but the stage was set for change.
Two years of protests, lobbying and petitions, led by artist Tang Huang-chen (湯皇珍) and others who squatted at the site, followed before the government decided to turn the former winery over to the Council for Cultural Affairs to administer.
Management of the area, now renamed the Huashan Arts District, was given to Tang and other artists, who formed the Association of Cultural and Environmental Reform in Taiwan (ACERT), which ran it for the next five years. Changes at the top of the council led to changes in the vision for the park, which officialdom avowed had nothing to do with the politically driven scandal that erupted over an outdoor drumming circle in June 2002 that created media hysteria and headlines that Huashan had become a haven for substance abuse and demands the site be closed down and redeveloped.
Not everyone was convinced by the denials and there definitely was a difference between the artistic visionaries — who preferred to focus on experimental and avant-garde works — and bureaucratic ambitions about the district’s direction. When the management contract was put up for bidding in late 2003, ACERT did not participate and L’Orangerie International Art Consultants won a one-year contract.
In 2005, Huashan was shuttered by the council for a multibillion New Taiwan dollar renovation and did not reopen again until mid-2007, under the name Huashan Culture Park and the management of the Taiwan Cultural-Creative Development Co, which had been given a 15-year deal.
While debate continues about who should be in the park and what types of events should be held there, a happy compromise appears to have been found since then between commercial ventures — an art gallery, yoga clothing store, restaurants and live concert venue — and small trade shows and exhibitions, such the Taiwan Designers Week, as well as the less commercial, with performance and rehearsal spaces given over to small and mid-sized dance and theater troupes and musicians. Weekends also find a thriving flea market for young designers and entrepreneurs.
The mix is fluid, sometimes even chaotic, but that is the charm and attraction of Huashan as visitors can continue to be surprised by what they find there. Taiwan Cultural-Creative Development Co should recognize that fluidity can be a good thing and not tinker too much with the balance between commercial and creative space as it continues to renovate and upgrade the park’s facilities.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with