Tue, Sep 20, 2011 - Page 9 News List

Toward a post-financial crisis doctrine of US interventionism

By Bennett Ramberg

As the US stumbles through its economic challenges at home, the pressure of world events will not subside. However, the US’ ability to address them has changed. Its fiscal weakness limits its ability to act as global policeman. Despite the relatively costless overthrow of former Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi’s regime, the US’ prolonged interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq have severely strained the public’s tolerance for an active foreign policy.

Nonetheless, the US seems destined to remain the world’s most important actor for the foreseeable future. However, today it is an actor without a script — it lacks a strategic guide comparable to the Cold War’s containment doctrine to prioritize policy.

Quite simply, the ad hoc policymaking that directed interventions in the Balkans, Somalia, Southwest Asia and the Middle East in the past two decades will not suffice in this new era of limitations. This suggests that the US should seek out an overarching strategy to discipline its impulses to fight wars of choice or engage in nation-building efforts.

US President Barack Obama’s National Security Strategy nurtures broad policy aspirations — “[n]ow we must position the United States to champion mutual interests among nations and peoples” — but falls short as a practical guide. I suggest an alternative strategy, one already embedded in US history, though largely unrecognized. However, making explicit what lies implicit can sharpen US decision-making.

I call this strategy the “Watershed Doctrine.” A watershed is a tipping point, a turning point, a game changer. When the US has confronted a “negative watershed” — a lethal threat to the country — it committed meaningful financial and human resources in order to address the risks. Positive watersheds — opportunities to engineer seismic shifts in international or regional political affairs through nation-building, or to use economic and military assistance to prevent plausible negative watersheds — demand an equal level of commitment.

The Watershed concept provides policymakers with a standard to use — or at the very least to debate. It is an organizing tool for policymaking: Is an international challenge a watershed or not? If so, get involved. If not, stay out.

We find watersheds throughout US history. The War of 1812 and the Civil War are clear examples. Had US forces not expelled the British from US territory in the first, and had then-US president Abraham Lincoln and the Union not prevailed in the second, the country would have been balkanized and unable to become the dominant power of the 20th century.

By contrast, the US’ flirtation with colonialism in the Spanish American War, its involvement in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean throughout the 20th century, and, arguably, World War I, were not watersheds for the US. However, the US’ inability after the Great War to overcome Old World politics at Versailles and isolationism at home marked a failed opportunity to promote a positive watershed.

That failure placed the world on the path to the -negative -watershed posed by Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. Nothing foreordained that the US and its allies would prevail. Had the Axis’s negative watershed succeeded, the US would have become a far different country.

A positive watershed, under-appreciated today, developed in the years immediately after World War II with the political transformation of Germany and Japan. The US’ remarkable investment of resources in this outcome made both countries stable, peaceful democracies, thereby eliminating them as adversaries and turning them into vital bulwarks against the next harbinger of a negative watershed, the Soviet Union.

This story has been viewed 2852 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top