Director Wei Te-sheng’s (魏德聖) movie Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale, which tells the tale of the 1930 Wushe Incident, is proving very popular with the public, whether they be pan-blue, pan-green or swing voters.
If the media buzz surrounding the film helps people to learn more about the history of Taiwanese Aborigines and Taiwan in general, it can hardly be a bad thing.
The fear is that various interests will play on the theme for a while to get what they can out of it, and then they will throw it away and forgotten it.
Seediq Bale means “a true man” in the Sediq language. The movie tells the story of how Sediq chief Mona Rudao and other members of his tribe confronted the armed might of their foreign rulers.
Determined to preserve their own culture and dignity, they were willing to give up their lives rather than submit.
This spirit is similar to that of the many Taiwanese literary writers who have steadfastly resisted foreign colonialism by establishing a Taiwan-centric literary current.
As well as supporting the movie by buying tickets, we should also think about how to express this spirit in our educational and cultural establishments.
Let us take a recent major event on Taiwan’s literary scene as an example. Taiwanese author Chung Tie-min (鍾鐵民) passed away last month, and his funeral was held on Sep. 10.
His family and friends were there to bid him farewell, but President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) also sent representatives to deliver official eulogies in honor of Chung’s great achievements.
A lot of people in attendance had mixed feelings about this gesture, which was reminiscent of the fable of the weasel who, with ulterior motives, visited a mother hen to wish her a happy new year.
What kind of support did Ma and his government offer when Chung was preparing to set up a memorial hall in honor of his father, the writer Chung Li-ho (鍾理和)?
As everyone knows, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) accepted the surrender of Japanese forces in Taiwan and the northern part if Vietnam on behalf of the Allied Forces in 1945, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which had come to Taiwan from overseas, tried to suppress Taiwanese languages, literature and culture.
Taking departments and institutes of Taiwanese literature as an example, it was not until 2000, 55 years after the KMT takeover, that the authorities approved the first master’s course in Taiwanese literature at a state-run university — National Cheng Kung University — followed by the establishment of an undergraduate department in 2002.
During the period when Tu Cheng-sheng (杜正勝) was minister of education under the Democratic Progressive Party administration, he encouraged the internationalization of research on Taiwan at universities, and he actively promoted the teaching of native languages to elementary and high-school students.
However, following the KMT’s return to government in 2008, these policies have been scrapped bit by bit.
Now, the government offers encouragement and funding for Chinese academics, students and literary writers to come to Taiwan.
In May this year, the Council for Cultural Affairs sponsored a seminar on the theme of “ a century of novels.”
The list of invited participants was full of Chinese writers, while writers who use the medium of Taiwanese native languages were completely excluded, along with their works.
In June, Taiwan-centric civic groups went to the Ministry of Education to demand the inclusion of Taiwanese languages in the formal curriculum of schools at all levels.
The ministry did not accept this request, instead announcing an additional mandatory course in senior high schools based on textbooks on basic Chinese culture that accounted for four study credits.
In light of this, who can say that the KMT has changed its anti-Taiwanese nature? Rather than conferring posthumous eulogies, it would be better for the KMT to sincerely face up to its past wrongdoings and turn over a new leaf.
What the authorities should really do is change the system in a way that will uphold the rightful status of Taiwanese literature and culture in education and the media.
Chiung Wi-vun is an associate professor of Taiwanese literature at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry