New York is a city that forgets quickly. Teeming with ambition, its denizens are focused on getting ahead. And what is striking today is how remote the disaster of Sept. 11, 2001, now is for most New Yorkers.
Since the attack, the city has endured two dramatic economic cycles. More than other US cities, New York’s population is always churning. According to the City Department of Planning’s most recent estimates, from June 2009, the city attracted 647,000 immigrants over the last decade, mainly from Latin America and Asia.
For most new New Yorkers, the attack on the World Trade Center and the image of the gargantuan towers, which for a generation imposed itself over the lower Manhattan skyline, is something distant. That is difficult for those of us who lived here before the attacks to comprehend, but that psychological distance will become only more pronounced as time passes.
Prior to Sept. 11, the greatest disaster in the city’s history was the death of more than 1,000 people after the steamboat the General Slocum caught fire and sank in New York’s East River on June 15, 1904. Most of the victims were German immigrants, mainly women and children, on their way to a picnic. They were members of a church that stands blocks from the apartment where I grew up. Like all of my neighborhood friends, however, I never heard about the General Slocum disaster when I was a child.
With the fallen Twin Towers, however, we are dealing with more than just the inevitable fading of memories and migration patterns. In just 10 years, the neighborhood surrounding the World Trade Center site has been radically transformed. Roughly 100,000 people lost their jobs in the area following the attacks, including many of the 50,000 who worked in the Trade Center itself. Several other large commercial buildings surrounding the Twin Towers were also destroyed.
Many older office buildings in the area were unable to retain tenants, who decided to move away from the ubiquitous scenes of destruction. Landlords chose to convert these offices to residences, and now about 40,000 people live in lower Manhattan, double the number before Sept. 11.
After eight years of deadlock and inaction, two huge office towers are rising on the Ground Zero site. The magazine publisher Conde Nast has announced that it will move 5,000 workers into the 541m tall One World Trade Center in 2014, shortly after its completion. A memorial that features two huge square reflecting pools in the actual footprint of the towers was scheduled to open to the families of Sept. 11 yesterday, on the 10th anniversary of the attacks, and to the public today.
While some will be stirred by the redeveloped Ground Zero, others will find the fountains oppressive and exhausting, and the new glass towers cold and soulless. However, inflated architectural ambitions and commercial rapaciousness are a part of New York City and it would have been naive to have imagined that the redevelopment would not reflect this.
Last year, faced with a controversy that dominated national headlines and inflamed outsiders, locals reacted sensibly and with equanimity. In May last year, the community board, which is made up of area residents, voted 29-to-1 in favor of a plan to build a 13-story mosque and community center just two blocks from Ground Zero. Questions about the mosque lingered for months afterward, with small demonstrations at the proposed site organized by people who had no connection to the neighborhood. Despite efforts by tabloid media to incite conflict, most New Yorkers ignored the dispute.
In marked contrast to the city, the country as a whole, 10 years after Sept. 11, finds itself deeply mired in the fallout from the attacks. The current political deadlock and recriminations in Washington are rooted in the shortsighted, impulsive and emotional decisions that followed the first attack on the US mainland since the War of 1812.
The 6.5 hectare Ground Zero redevelopment site was for eight years also a victim of deadlock, remaining an ugly pit in the ground as disputes between various stakeholders with competing interests froze development. The looming 10th anniversary concentrated minds. Compromises were made and the work of building took precedence. It was time to move forward.
One can only hope that the US’ national political leaders, looking ahead, will perform more rationally than they have over the past 10 years. Among New York City’s great virtues is its constant reinvention. New Yorkers have never allowed themselves to be prisoners of the past. All Americans would do well to follow their example.
Jacob Margolies is the general counsel for the Americas for the Yomiuri Shimbun, Japan’s largest media group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry