The amount of junk in space is rising exponentially, with continuous collisions between abandoned equipment, spent rockets and other debris creating ever growing clouds of dangerous fragments, an influential report said on Thursday.
The report, commissioned by NASA, said the quantity of hazardous material circling the Earth has reached a “tipping point” and poses a real and increasing danger to satellites and the International Space Station (ISS).
It suggested developing a clean-up strategy, which could include catching debris with nets, magnets or giant umbrellas.
The US National Research Council was asked to review the space agency’s meteoroid and orbital debris programs in April following a request from the White House. Meteoroids are particles or larger lumps of rock in the solar system.
“The current space environment is growing increasingly hazardous to spacecraft and astronauts,” said Donald Kessler, chair of the committee responsible for the report and a retired head of NASA’s orbital debris program. “NASA needs to determine the best path forward for tackling the multifaceted problems caused by meteoroids and orbital debris that put human and robotic space operations at risk.”
While the report, Limiting future collision risk to spacecraft, found NASA had used available resources wisely, the authors raised concerns that the agency’s programs had no overall management or budget and that most programs were run by one person, making them vulnerable to staff changes.
Objects in space ranging from the huge upper stages of Russian rockets to tiny particles of liquid coolant are tracked by ground-based radars operated by NASA and other space agencies. About half a million fragments and objects larger than a centimeter are in low orbit around Earth. There are tens of millions of particles larger than a millimeter.
Even minuscule specks of debris can cause serious damage to spacecraft and satellites because of the immense speeds at which they travel.
“The average impact velocity is 10km per second,” Kessler said. “And at 2km per second, the energy of the collision is equivalent to the particle’s mass in TNT.”
The potential threat from space debris became more pressing after China destroyed an orbiting weather satellite with a missile in 2007 as part of an anti-satellite test, and two satellites collided over Siberia in 2009.
These events more than doubled the amount of cataloged fragmentation debris in space, which had remained almost constant for the previous 20 years.
The report adds that NASA may have to launch operations to remove space junk from orbit, or find other ways to reduce the dangers posed by debris.
Since the NASA space shuttle program was retired, there are no tried and tested means to remove defunct satellites and other space junk from orbit.
Several companies and agencies are exploring ways to clean up the space environment, with techniques that range from capturing the junk in lightweight nets to launching probes that latch on to debris and steer it into the atmosphere, where it will burn up.
Any program aimed at removing space junk is likely to face serious legal hurdles, because current principles restrict countries to salvaging only their own objects. NASA estimates that about 30 percent of space junk can be attributed to the US. In anticipation of future clean-up operations, 12 countries set up the Inter-Agency Space Debris Co--ordination Committee in 1993 to oversee the program.
“The Cold War is over, but the acute sensitivity regarding satellite -technology remains,” said George Gleghorn, the report’s co-author and chief engineer for the TRW Space and Technology Group.
Although NASA had identified the need for removing debris, the agency and the US government had not fully examined the economic, technological, political and legal considerations, the report said.
“The longer you wait to do this, the more expensive it’s going to be. Given the economy, we’ll probably end up putting it off, but that’s really not very wise. This scenario of increasing space debris will play out even if we don’t put anything else in orbit,” Kessler said.
Satellite and spacecraft manufacturers routinely build additional shields to protect against debris strikes, but there is a trade-off between safety and weight. The ISS has shields designed to withstand strikes from centimeter-sized objects, but satellites are less well protected.
Mission controllers can alter the orbits of the ISS and some satellites to avoid collisions, but this is not always effective.
In 2009, satellite operators might have been able to prevent the satellite collision over Siberia, but the defunct Russian Cosmos satellite involved was ranked 16th on a list of objects the US Iridium satellite was most likely to strike.
“Any avoidance move would have been to avoid something else,” Kessler said.
Deadly debris
‧ The oldest known piece of space junk is the US Vanguard 1 communications satellite. It was launched in 1958 and failed in 1964.
‧ The US’ space shuttles were regularly struck by space debris or rock. On average, NASA engineers replaced two damaged windows on every mission.
‧ A solar panel on the International Space Station (ISS) tore apart after a guide wire was hit by debris.
‧ In June, the ISS crew were ordered to take shelter in two Soyuz lifeboats after NASA spotted debris approaching.
‧ In 2007, the pilot of an airliner flying from Chile to New Zealand spotted a defunct Russian spy satellite falling from the sky and noted the sonic boom it made as it passed.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing