The Ministry of Education decided on Wednesday to discontinue the tri-city high school entrance exam, rejecting a major education policy of Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin’s (郝龍斌) administration. The move came shortly after the exam sparked dispute over its problematic admissions threshold.
The ministry’s announcement was a slap in the face for Hau, who introduced the exam as part of his “single-version textbook” policy in 2008 to oppose the then-Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s multiple-textbook policy, which promoted diverse learning. The rights of students in the three participating municipalities — Taipei, New Taipei City (新北市) and Keelung — were sacrificed in the name of politics as the problematic policy was introduced and poorly implemented.
Political confrontation overrode educational considerations in these cities’ policy-making processes. Because of Hau’s collaboration with New Taipei City and Keelung in adopting the policy, students were forced to use different textbooks than their peers in other cities and counties, while they had to take entrance exams that were held on the same day as the national entrance exam.
Mounting opposition from parents and students because of miscalculations of reference scores and complicated admissions procedures finally forced the ministry to put an end to the exam. However, a sense of uncertainty remains for more than 200,000 junior-high school students who used the city-designated textbooks.
Education is a key foundation to the nation’s development, and education policies should be shaped through comprehensive considerations. It is regrettable that the mayor of Taipei set a bad example by allowing political ideology to interfere with education policies.
Hau’s failure to take full responsibility for his erronous policy is especially notable when compared with the recent resignation of the mayor of Seoul after a referendum on his school lunch policy.
Oh See-hoon stepped down on Friday after Seoul residents voted against his policy that free school lunches should only be available for children from poor families.
Oh, 50, was considered a possible presidential candidate for the ruling conservatives. He put his job on the line to stop what he called destructive welfare, and when he lost the referendum, he kept his promise to quit.
In sharp contrast, of all the officials involving in formulating the tri-city policy, including Hau and Minister of Education Wu Ching-chi (吳清基), who helped outline the policy as a former Education Department commissioner in Taipei City, the only one to take responsibility for its failure was former Education Department commissioner Kang Tzong-hu (康宗虎), who stepped down earlier this month.
Hau promised to present a post-exam report on the problematic reference scores and admissions threshold and finalize a list of officials to be penalized, but has not lived up to his promise.
When asked about his responsibility for the policy, Hau simply apologized for the termination of the tri-city entrance exam and said his team would communicate with parents and students while discussing -follow-up measures with schools, revealing his evasive attitude during the biggest storm of his political career.
Some critics said the ministry’s abrupt announcement that it would discontinue the exam aimed to eliminate the negative impact of the policy and pave the way for the 12-year compulsory education policy, a major education reform under President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration.
The 12-year policy, which will extend compulsory education from nine years to 12 years by 2014, lacks substantial guidelines and detailed plans. If the central government fails to learn from the example of the tri-city high school exam debacle and launches a major education reform policy in haste, our children’s rights to a proper education will once again be sacrificed.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under