Elegant and well-groomed, sometimes in shimmering white, sometimes in gray, she turns to her supporters squeezed into the few available public seats and calls out a formal salute: “Glory to Ukraine!”
“Glory to our heroes,” they reply, and the peasant-braided former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko takes her seat on the accused’s bench of a Kiev courtroom.
The Tymoshenko trial — or “show” as her critics might say — gets underway.
Tymoshenko will not rise from her seat again until she leaves the court, where she is on trial for abuse of office. She will certainly not stand out of respect for the judge, whom she disdains as a “puppet” in the pay of darker forces.
There are times when the tiny downtown courtroom seems too small a theater to handle the Tymoshenko phenomenon.
The fire and resolve that made her the field-marshal of Ukraine’s 2004 “Orange Revolution,” which overturned a rigged presidential election, appear undiminished.
However, she is thinner in the face now and more tired in the eyes. Her lawyers say she is sick. Two weeks of overnight detention in Kiev’s Luk’yanivska prison are telling.
However, it is hard to know who to feel more sorry for: 50-year-old Tymoshenko or the boyish, bespectacled judge, Rodion Kireyev, who has been her target from the first day.
“There’s a joke about a monkey sitting on a branch holding a hand-grenade. They are cutting the branch from under him. ‘My’ judge is the monkey with the grenade on the branch with the saw in his own hands,” she wrote in a “tweet” from the courtroom.
At times, her performance obscures the seriousness of the charge — using her powers as prime minister to push through a deal with Russia in 2009 that, her critics say, saddled the country with too high a price for gas. If convicted, she could be sentenced to up to 10 years in jail.
She denies the charge. The trial, she says, is a vendetta conducted by the clan of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, her arch-foe and the only person who merits more invective from her than Kireyev.
A BLUNDER?
Many observers see the trial as a miscalculation by the Yanukovych administration, a poorly thought-out move aimed at ending Tymoshenko as a political force during the summer lull before the start of a difficult new political season.
Since being narrowly defeated by Yanukovych in a run-off for the presidency in February last year, Tymoshenko has failed to rally a united opposition around her. She was in the doldrums. However, the trial thrust her back into the headlines and plays to her strong suit, an appetite for political theater.
She thrives on the fray, has inexhaustible energy and holds a burning conviction that she alone can save Ukraine from what she describes as the “criminal” leadership of Yanukovych.
She has already pulled off a notable success. The US and the EU, whose support Ukraine needs for economic recovery, have expressed concern about what looks like a politically driven trial. They would like her to be released from detention.
Even Russia, not always on the same side as the West over Ukraine, has spoken out against the trial and defended the gas deal. Yanukovych has so far refused to intervene.
Playing the victim is what Tymoshenko does best. When the judge placed her in police custody on Aug. 5, she declared: “You might as well shoot me now. Give her [the prosecutor] a revolver.”
Another time, she expressed fears for her own safety in prison, but promised her supporters not to end her own life.
Those “millions” who had invoked her name in prayers for her children had stiffened her readiness to serve Ukraine.
“This is my DNA,” she wrote in a “letter from prison” published in an online newspaper.
This all plays well with the faithful, many of whom revere Tymoshenko and know her only as Vona (“She”).
Her right-hand man, Olexander Turchinov, slaps down any suggestion that she might have deliberately provoked her own detention for political purposes.
“People who say that have never spent every day in a police detention cell. I’d like to take them on a tour there to end this [talk] once and for all,” he said.
Political analyst Mikhail Pogrebinsky said the trial had only resurrected her as a political force.
“Those who advised the president failed to correctly calculate the consequences of this affair. It is a serious mistake,” he said.
“Anyone will tell you that Tymoshenko is now in her element. She’s a showman who is reaping the maximum PR from this spectacle ... She is certain that she can stimulate a revolutionary mood in the country,” Pogrebinsky said. “Who would write about Tymoshenko every day if it were not for this trial?”
GAME PLAN
Hundreds of her supporters brandishing flags adorned with the red heart symbol of her Batkivshchyna party spend days and nights in tents in a vigil outside the courthouse. The area reverberates to choruses of “Yulia, Yulia” as a motorized police escort sweeps her to and from court. However, the numbers involved are small compared with the protests of 2004 and nobody except Tymoshenko’s most ardent supporters predicts another “Orange” upheaval.
Despite her huge popularity in some parts of the country, many of the young and middle-class people who rallied to her in 2004 are not prepared to turn out for her now.
“I think we definitely need a change of the present government, but I am not in favor of Yulia either. My friends think the same,” said Tetyana, who runs a general food kiosk in an underpass near the courthouse.
So where does she go from here? And what is her game plan? Despite everything, serious issues are at stake.
Repercussions from the trial could influence Ukraine’s policy directions in the short term at least, including relations with Russia and steps toward integration with the EU.
Tymoshenko may believe that, whatever the outcome, Yanukovych’s credibility will be dented. Many commentators agree he faces a public relations defeat in the long run.
If she is jailed and then released under a pardon — a possible outcome — she will play that for all it is worth.
She spent several weeks in prison under former Ukrainian president Leonid Kuchma in 2001 — and emerged politically stronger.
She may be hoping to rally a united opposition around her and weaken the stranglehold that Yanukovych’s Party of Regions has in parliament before next year’s election.
Leaders from smaller opposition parties have attended hearings and world heavyweight boxing champion Vitali Klitschko, who heads the Udar party, broke off training in Austria and returned to Kiev to show solidarity with Tymoshenko.
However, one-time presidential candidate Arseny Yatseniuk, who heads the Front of Changes party, has ruled out any merger of opposition parties just now, although he saw the possibility of a parliamentary alliance among opposition forces.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under