Elegant and well-groomed, sometimes in shimmering white, sometimes in gray, she turns to her supporters squeezed into the few available public seats and calls out a formal salute: “Glory to Ukraine!”
“Glory to our heroes,” they reply, and the peasant-braided former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko takes her seat on the accused’s bench of a Kiev courtroom.
The Tymoshenko trial — or “show” as her critics might say — gets underway.
Tymoshenko will not rise from her seat again until she leaves the court, where she is on trial for abuse of office. She will certainly not stand out of respect for the judge, whom she disdains as a “puppet” in the pay of darker forces.
There are times when the tiny downtown courtroom seems too small a theater to handle the Tymoshenko phenomenon.
The fire and resolve that made her the field-marshal of Ukraine’s 2004 “Orange Revolution,” which overturned a rigged presidential election, appear undiminished.
However, she is thinner in the face now and more tired in the eyes. Her lawyers say she is sick. Two weeks of overnight detention in Kiev’s Luk’yanivska prison are telling.
However, it is hard to know who to feel more sorry for: 50-year-old Tymoshenko or the boyish, bespectacled judge, Rodion Kireyev, who has been her target from the first day.
“There’s a joke about a monkey sitting on a branch holding a hand-grenade. They are cutting the branch from under him. ‘My’ judge is the monkey with the grenade on the branch with the saw in his own hands,” she wrote in a “tweet” from the courtroom.
At times, her performance obscures the seriousness of the charge — using her powers as prime minister to push through a deal with Russia in 2009 that, her critics say, saddled the country with too high a price for gas. If convicted, she could be sentenced to up to 10 years in jail.
She denies the charge. The trial, she says, is a vendetta conducted by the clan of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, her arch-foe and the only person who merits more invective from her than Kireyev.
Many observers see the trial as a miscalculation by the Yanukovych administration, a poorly thought-out move aimed at ending Tymoshenko as a political force during the summer lull before the start of a difficult new political season.
Since being narrowly defeated by Yanukovych in a run-off for the presidency in February last year, Tymoshenko has failed to rally a united opposition around her. She was in the doldrums. However, the trial thrust her back into the headlines and plays to her strong suit, an appetite for political theater.
She thrives on the fray, has inexhaustible energy and holds a burning conviction that she alone can save Ukraine from what she describes as the “criminal” leadership of Yanukovych.
She has already pulled off a notable success. The US and the EU, whose support Ukraine needs for economic recovery, have expressed concern about what looks like a politically driven trial. They would like her to be released from detention.
Even Russia, not always on the same side as the West over Ukraine, has spoken out against the trial and defended the gas deal. Yanukovych has so far refused to intervene.
Playing the victim is what Tymoshenko does best. When the judge placed her in police custody on Aug. 5, she declared: “You might as well shoot me now. Give her [the prosecutor] a revolver.”
Another time, she expressed fears for her own safety in prison, but promised her supporters not to end her own life.
Those “millions” who had invoked her name in prayers for her children had stiffened her readiness to serve Ukraine.
“This is my DNA,” she wrote in a “letter from prison” published in an online newspaper.
This all plays well with the faithful, many of whom revere Tymoshenko and know her only as Vona (“She”).
Her right-hand man, Olexander Turchinov, slaps down any suggestion that she might have deliberately provoked her own detention for political purposes.
“People who say that have never spent every day in a police detention cell. I’d like to take them on a tour there to end this [talk] once and for all,” he said.
Political analyst Mikhail Pogrebinsky said the trial had only resurrected her as a political force.
“Those who advised the president failed to correctly calculate the consequences of this affair. It is a serious mistake,” he said.
“Anyone will tell you that Tymoshenko is now in her element. She’s a showman who is reaping the maximum PR from this spectacle ... She is certain that she can stimulate a revolutionary mood in the country,” Pogrebinsky said. “Who would write about Tymoshenko every day if it were not for this trial?”
Hundreds of her supporters brandishing flags adorned with the red heart symbol of her Batkivshchyna party spend days and nights in tents in a vigil outside the courthouse. The area reverberates to choruses of “Yulia, Yulia” as a motorized police escort sweeps her to and from court. However, the numbers involved are small compared with the protests of 2004 and nobody except Tymoshenko’s most ardent supporters predicts another “Orange” upheaval.
Despite her huge popularity in some parts of the country, many of the young and middle-class people who rallied to her in 2004 are not prepared to turn out for her now.
“I think we definitely need a change of the present government, but I am not in favor of Yulia either. My friends think the same,” said Tetyana, who runs a general food kiosk in an underpass near the courthouse.
So where does she go from here? And what is her game plan? Despite everything, serious issues are at stake.
Repercussions from the trial could influence Ukraine’s policy directions in the short term at least, including relations with Russia and steps toward integration with the EU.
Tymoshenko may believe that, whatever the outcome, Yanukovych’s credibility will be dented. Many commentators agree he faces a public relations defeat in the long run.
If she is jailed and then released under a pardon — a possible outcome — she will play that for all it is worth.
She spent several weeks in prison under former Ukrainian president Leonid Kuchma in 2001 — and emerged politically stronger.
She may be hoping to rally a united opposition around her and weaken the stranglehold that Yanukovych’s Party of Regions has in parliament before next year’s election.
Leaders from smaller opposition parties have attended hearings and world heavyweight boxing champion Vitali Klitschko, who heads the Udar party, broke off training in Austria and returned to Kiev to show solidarity with Tymoshenko.
However, one-time presidential candidate Arseny Yatseniuk, who heads the Front of Changes party, has ruled out any merger of opposition parties just now, although he saw the possibility of a parliamentary alliance among opposition forces.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the