An article in Foreign Policy recently included Taiwan in a list of countries whose legislatures don’t work. The People First Party (PFP) is now officially entering the legislative elections and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has announced that he wants to start a second “Quiet Revolution” that would reform the government and the legislature.
Whether or not this happens will be decided by voters. However, regardless of what does happen, the only thing left for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the PFP is to battle it out. Soong has burned all his bridges and as he as nothing to lose, it is only a matter of time before he runs for president. Although the cleft between the two parties is still not a firm split, their mixture of talks and attacks won’t last long.
The adoption of a single-member district, double ballot system in the 2008 legislative elections was a watershed in Taiwanese party politics. Experts criticized the system, saying it meant that the winner would take all, making it difficult for smaller parties to survive. However, it could also give smaller parties more opportunities and more clout to attack the bigger parties.
In other words, small parties would be able to create problems for big ones, so it would all depend on whether the big parties could show some good will toward the smaller. For next year’s legislative elections, for example, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) are cooperating, and the TSU has agreed to only seek legislator-at-large seats. However, the KMT is constantly quarreling with the PFP and the New Party over party autonomy issues, despite KMT claims that they are on friendly terms, and will only let the smaller parties field candidates in districts where it does not expect to do well.
In the past few elections, neither the KMT, DPP or the PFP have mustered a legislative majority, but in the 2008 legislative elections, the KMT, including the PFP and the New Party, gained 81 of the 113 seats, while the DPP won only 27 seats, giving the KMT the “total power” it was aiming for. The legislative chaos continued, mainly because of the parties’ selfishness and the constant battles between the pan-blue and pan-green camps, as well as the uneven quality of legislators.
Now the PFP suggests that a legislature where none of the three biggest parties reach an absolute majority is what we need. To win enough votes to be able to promote legislative reform, the PFP will need new ideas. If all the party wants is three legislators to be able to organize a legislative party caucus or if they fail to secure as many seats proportionally as they won in the 2001 legislative elections — when they gained 46 seats against the DPP’s 87, the KMT’s 68, the TSU’s 13 and independent candidates’ 11 seats — they will be in trouble. If they don’t get at least 10 seats, they will not be strong enough.
The situation in the past was very different and some political scientists are already predicting that electoral alliances and coalition governments will become unavoidable.
It’s no longer a matter of whether or not we want it, but one of timing and finding the right partner. If the government or the opposition lacks a grasp of the overall situation, they will not be able to keep up with changes and will fall behind.
In one sense, the president under Taiwan’s dual-executive system, also known as a semi-presidential system, has more power than a president in a presidential system. At times of national emergency, Taiwan’s president can even exercise emergency powers.
One would think, then, that a president supported by 7.65 million voters and who controls a legislative majority should be able to handle things smoothly. Instead, the efficiency of the leadership and political achievement are in direct inverse proportion to the government’s power. This is the main reason why Soong and the PFP are regaining popularity.
A comparison between the current opinion polls for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), DDP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Soong shows that Ma and Tsai are running neck and neck, while Soong, although he has not announced his candidacy, already has the support of more than 10 percent of voters, three times the number of signatures — 250,000 — needed to launch a run for the presidency.
Extrapolating from the average percentage of votes gained in the past few elections, PFP support stands at about 10 to 15 percent, more than the 5 percent threshold for entry into the legislature. The PFP has received 15.8 percent support in recent opinion polls. However, the party will face a severe challenge in the 28 constituencies where the KMT traditionally wins and the 20 constituencies where the DPP traditionally wins.
The PFP is estimated to win at least 10 at-large and constituency legislative seats. Combined with the expected increase in the number of seats for the pan-green camp, this would cause the KMT to lose at least 20 seats, in which case none of the three parties would gain an absolute majority.
Timing and circumstances create successful people, and with these factors on Soong’s side, he could well make a comeback. However, election results over the past 10 years show that voters are becoming increasingly independent and that is what will bring about political reform.
.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under