Since last week, financial markets worldwide have been shaken by uncertainty. Reuters news agency estimates that US$2.5 trillion was wiped from the value of global stock markets in just eight days. The main reason for this turmoil is probably investors’ fears of a double-dip recession in the wake of the US’ and EU’s debt crises and weak economic performances. To make matters worse, on Aug. 5, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) stunned global financial markets by cutting the US’ sovereign credit rating from “AAA” to “AA+.” It is hard to foresee how much of an impact this unprecedented move might have.
The compromise plan enacted in Washington calls for US$2.4 trillion in spending cuts over the next 10 years, while raising the limit for US government borrowing from US$14.3 trillion to US$16.4 trillion. Many people thought that the impact of the debate about the US’ debt would end when the bill was passed, but that was not the case.
The first data released following the deal showed a decline in US consumer spending. This was followed by news that adjusted US GDP growth for the first quarter of this year was 0.4 percent, down sharply from an earlier estimate of 1.9 percent, and that the economy grew only 1.3 percent in the second quarter. Next, while Washington announced that the unemployment rate slid to 9.2 percent last month from 9.1 percent in June, experts blew the cover off this apparently good news by pointing out that the real reason for the fall was the number of unemployed people who had dropped out of the job market because they had given up trying to find work.
In addition, the US deficit-reduction plan includes cuts in unemployment benefits, welfare spending and other measures that have heightened people’s fear and uncertainty about the future. Under threat of a second recession, investors, feeling pessimistic and insecure, are looking for safe havens for their investments. They have been withdrawing funds in US dollars from financial markets worldwide, causing market indices to fall and the value of the US dollar to rise. However, some of these funds have been converted into Swiss francs, yen, gold and other markets, so the US dollar still ended up losing value.
S&P’s lowered credit rating for the US is having widespread repercussions. In the past, US Treasury bonds enjoyed the optimum triple-A rating, so they were generally seen as a zero-risk investment instrument and served as a benchmark for floating interest rates.
Now that the US government has had its credit rating cut, US Treasury bonds will no longer be seen as a zero-risk investment. Consequently, the entire interest rate structure associated with them needs to be rebuilt and that will be a major operation.
There are about 7,000 US government-associated debt securities, all of whose credit ratings will be affected. When credit ratings slide, interest rates will go up and the price of debt securities will fall. Bondholders stand to lose out, so they may have to adjust their investment portfolios accordingly. In the short term, this is likely to cause volatility throughout the market. If the result is a fall in demand for US bonds, the US Federal Reserve will once again be forced to print money and the after-effects of that would be even harder to fix.
In Europe, problems have surfaced one after another, starting with the Greek debt crisis, which has spread to Italy, Spain and other countries in the eurozone. The economies of most of these debtor nations are not strong enough to make good on their repayment pledges and the EU has not managed to find a radical policy solution. Short-term painkillers have limited effect, so investors are treading carefully. At the same time, European banks hold too many dubious European debt securities, and their excessive risk exposure may lead to a financial crisis.
Beyond that, the various contractionary policy plans countries have come up with to correct their fiscal deficits are the chief culprit behind fears of a recession. As these problems plague the US and Europe, the entire global economy is in a very shaky state.
Of course, the key problem is that governing parties in democratic countries in the 21st century would rather borrow and spend to win favor with voters than raise taxes and get voted out of office. This mindset has caused many countries to fall deep into debt, in some cases even bringing the nation to the brink of bankruptcy. It is important to remember what happened in the early 20th century when the gold exchange standard became the norm. At that time, many countries printed money willy-nilly in an attempt to boost their economies, but this eventually led to runaway hyperinflation. Only later did they accept the unspoken rule that central banks should be independent.
In the 21st century, many countries have found themselves deep in debt. Maybe it will not be until they have learned the hard way that governments and voters in these countries will realize the price to be paid for borrowing, and make it a general rule that the national debt should not be allowed to get out of hand.
Norman Yin is a professor of financial studies at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations