Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ attempt to upgrade the Palestinians’ status at the UN, despite US and Israeli opposition, signals a bolder approach by a leader keen to forge a legacy after years of failed peace talks.
However, Palestinians are divided on the merits of the diplomatic offensive. In the West Bank, Abbas’ Fatah movement bills it as a turning point in the Palestinian struggle, while in Gaza, a politician from rival Islamist Hamas dismissed it as hot air.
Israel is wary. The Palestinians will likely emerge from next month’s UN General Assembly meeting with a status upgrade that will give them access to dozens of UN agencies.
However, talk in Israel of a looming “diplomatic tsunami” has subsided.
Abbas’ Plan A — to secure full UN membership for Palestine — is destined to fail. The US, which has veto power in the UN Security Council, is expected to oppose a move viewed in Washington as unhelpful to its Middle East diplomacy.
Plan B, as outlined by Palestinian officials, is to ask the General Assembly to upgrade Palestine to a non-member state from its current status as an observer. That would not need Security Council approval and elevate the Palestinians’ UN status to that of the Vatican.
Some say unless it is part of a deep rethink of Palestinian strategy, the upgrade would have little more than symbolic value and bring Palestinians no closer to independence in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.
“It’s a first step, but without further steps it is politically meaningless,” said George Giacaman, a political scientist at Birzeit University in the West Bank. “If the Palestinian Authority has a plan for after September, it hasn’t announced it.”
Born of paralysis in the peace process, next month’s move is being portrayed by Palestinian officials in the occupied West Bank as a step toward leveling the playing field in the struggle with Israel.
Though they have stated an intention to seek full UN membership, the Palestinians have yet to submit their application to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the first step in the process.
However, they are confident of success in the General Assembly thanks to support from states including Brazil and Argentina, among the most recent to recognize Palestine.
The move brings with it risks, particularly to the international aid upon which the Palestinian Authority depends. The US Congress last month passed a resolution urging a suspension of aid to the Palestinians over the initiative.
However, it will produce some tangible results, giving the Palestinians access to UN agencies and potentially allowing them direct recourse to the International Criminal Court, where they could pursue cases against Israel.
“It’s about opening new doors for the cause of Palestine,” said Mohammad Shtayyeh, an official involved in the bid.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu does not seem overly concerned by that prospect.
When discussing next month, his aides say he invokes a catchphrase from an old Israeli television commercial: “Unpleasant, but not terrible.”
Israel seems more wary about the potential for next month to trigger Palestinian protests inspired by the Arab Spring.
The Palestinian leadership has called for mass protests in support of the bid under the slogan “Palestine 194,” referring to their aim of becoming the 194th member of the UN.
However, while calling for peaceful protests, the leadership has been criticized for doing little toward organizing them.
“You can’t get people out to demonstrate at the touch of a button,” Fathi Barkawi, a Palestinian broadcaster, told participants during an official conference on ways to support next month’s initiative.
“Who said all the people have confidence in the leadership and will respond to them?” he added.
Reconciliation between Abbas’ West Bank administration and Hamas in Gaza is seen as vital for mobilizing popular support behind next month’s initiative and, more broadly, any new Palestinian strategy.
The political impact of a status upgrade is in danger of being diminished by the split, which persists despite a deal earlier this year aimed at ending it.
The groups remain at odds over how to pursue their national cause. Hamas refuses to recognize Israel and advocates an armed strategy, while Abbas opposes any form of violence and says negotiations are still his preferred path.
The Palestine Strategy Group, a think tank, said in a new report that international diplomacy such as the UN initiative can be just one part of a new Palestinian approach.
“The most important thing is Palestinian unity,” said Hany al-Masri, an author of the document.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry