Agriculture has once again been in the news. After battling over bananas and papayas, the pan-blue and pan-green political parties are now focusing debate on increases in subsidies for elderly farmers. The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) legislative caucus has proposed increasing subsidies for elderly farmers from NT$6,000 to NT$7,000 and have listed this as a priority bill for their next legislative session.
While the ruling party has stated that it needs to consider its finances, it will probably support the bill because of election pressure. It is sad that each time an increase in subsidies is proposed, it seems to coincide with legislative or presidential elections. Many are saying the rise in subsidies is little more than electioneering.
On average, farmers earn an annual income of NT$873,000. Not only is this lower than the national average of NT$1.128 million, but the amount they receive from farming itself doesn’t even account for NT$200,000 of the total. In recent years, farmers have been hit by increasing initial outlay and living costs, all going up at a rate much higher than the increased revenue from farming.
Considering the long-term contribution to food security and the preservation of the environment that farming makes, it is correct and necessary to increase subsidies, when appropriate, for our elderly farmers. However, these subsidies lack a wealth exclusion clause and there are currently many “farmers” driving around in luxury automobiles and living in mansions.
Apart from owning land and sitting around waiting for its designation for use to change so they can sell it off or use it for other things, such people also enjoy benefits like farmer’s insurance, subsidies for elderly farmers, crop subsidies and tax exemptions, and this is not in line with the principle of social justice.
The government should clearly define what constitutes elderly farmer status to identify who is eligible. These subsidies now account for more than 70 percent of total expenditure on agriculture and have been in place for a long time, and so have become a huge financial burden. Farmland utilization rates are low, with large areas of farmland being left idle and neglected. Spending on agricultural infrastructure has been discouraged and there is a lack of funds available for scientific research and development. It is high time something was done about this.
These are not new problems. If politicians were genuinely concerned about the livelihood of elderly farmers, they would have implemented agricultural reforms some time ago, not just in the run-up to an election. As it is, they conveniently come up with these proposals to keep the farmers happy, only to drop them again after the election, and even give out the most important executive positions in the industry as a political pat on the back to others, or simply for the sake of gaining some political capital for themselves.
In an age where politics trumps competence, agricultural policies can change overnight. This not only leaves farmers disoriented, it also makes businesses avoid agriculture, making it impossible to upgrade our agricultural system.
After all, even the best policies need people to implement them to deliver on their mandates. Especially now, with elections just around the corner, the majority of agricultural policy has been aimed at achieving short-term gains. Subsidy increases are constantly being proposed, restrictions on who is eligible for subsidies are being relaxed in an attempt to win over voters and the government has shown that it lacks the courage to carry out reform.
After relying on government protection for so long, our farmers have lost their ability to respond to change and cope on their own. This is the real source of Taiwan’s agricultural problems.
The main aim of agricultural policies is increasing the income of farmers and making rural economies more prosperous. Both presidential candidates have stated that Taiwan’s agricultural sector has to become more streamlined and move toward higher-value-based activities.
However, no concrete plans have been put in place yet. If the agricultural sector is to be upgraded and become more competitive internationally, constant innovations in industrial science and technology are necessary. However, our current agricultural testing and research institutions are getting old, and research is moving in the wrong direction.
We also have a problem with confidentiality surrounding the findings on agricultural science, techniques and crop varieties, with a great deal of Taiwan’s technology and knowledge of new crop varieties being leaked to China. Many agricultural researchers are leaving their jobs and the achievements of agricultural science and technology are being exaggerated. The contribution agricultural science and technology is making toward agriculture is decreasing and agricultural science and technology are no longer made freely available to farmers.
These are but a few of the problems facing Taiwan’s agricultural industry, yet nobody has said anything about how these problems should be solved. Another important issue is how to go about getting the younger generation to work on the land, because this would inject new energy into rural areas.
All the talk about how to best set up more complete production and marketing mechanisms and steady the price of agricultural produce, how to best promote low-carbon, green industries, how to carry out sustainable management for agriculture and how to increase exports of agricultural products to increase the income of farmers is just that: a bunch of talk. This makes people feel the government is ruling the nation with little more than slogans.
As the structure of our economy has changed, the gap between rural communities and cities has increased. Relying on agricultural subsidies alone is not enough to meet the goal of closing the gap in incomes between the countryside and cities. Instead, this will create an even bigger money pit.
Farmers want to be able to survive off their crops and live with dignity. I sincerely hope that political hacks stop manipulating agricultural policy for their own political interests.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and