More often than not, it is China who is singled out as the bully when Taiwan and its people encounter injustice and ill-treatment on the international stage and at international events.
It therefore came as no surprise when Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) on Tuesday said Chinese pressure was behind taekwondo athlete Yang Shu-chun’s (楊淑君) decision to drop her appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport over her controversial disqualification from the Asian Games in China last year.
Some Taiwanese are quick to direct their fury at China, but now consider the case closed. However, simply blaming China should not mean it is the end of the story.
Indeed, from clandestine sabotage and blatant assaults to Chinese competitors verbally attacking Taiwanese competitors and ripping national flags from the hands of Taiwanese medalists, the list describing China’s alleged harassment of Taiwanese athletes is long. Considering its long-standing ambition to annex Taiwan and its attempts to belittle Taiwan at every juncture, China clearly is the usual suspect, and rightly so.
It is easy to pin the blame on China and to point the finger at international organizations and members of the international community who are so cowardly that they yield to China’s bullying and choose to comply with China’s schemes and trickery in degrading Taiwan. However, it is even more despicable when the ones allegedly toeing Beijing’s line are those who Taiwan calls its own.
Sadly, this appears to be what lies behind Yang’s surprise announcement last week.
According to the letter Gao publicized on Tuesday, which he said was written by Chinese sports official Wei Jizhong (魏紀中) and addressed to former Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee chairman Chang Feng-shu (張豐緒), Taiwan was advised to “weigh its options” in the appeal and give consideration to what chance it had of winning the case.
In all fairness, Wei’s letter, dated Dec. 22, could very well be read as simply stating China’s view on the issue, including the view that Taiwan may be blaming the wrong parties — namely, the Olympic Council of Asia and the Guangzhou Asian Games Organizing Committee.
Some are determined to link the Chinese official’s letter to the reasons behind Yang’s decision, but China cannot truly threaten or force Yang into making such a decision unless there is an organization or people who serve as China’s agents in Taiwan that coerced her into it. Yang would have been more likely to drop the appeal if the Sports Affairs Council pulled its support for her.
As former president of the Chinese Taipei Taekwondo Association, Chen Chien-ping (陳建平) disclosed that Yang has several times told him in tears that she feared for the safety of her family if she did not drop the appeal. If this is true, it is reasonable to believe that she made her decision under duress.
It is one thing to be bullied by others; it is another to be let down by the ones you consider your own. There is nothing more disheartening and demoralizing than knowing the people who are supposed to be standing by you are giving up the fight.
It is little wonder that Yang, after saying that she was withdrawing the appeal in order to focus on her training for the 2012 London Olympic Games, is reportedly now considering dropping out of the London Games altogether.
What good is the Sports Affairs Council, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government for that matter, when they cannot stick up for their own people? In the current circumstances, Taiwan needs less cowardly officials and more of those who have the guts to stand up for their own people and resist China’s saber rattling.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry