Because of pressures caused by low birthrates, universities have come up with large sums of money in an attempt to attract more students to their schools. A certain national university on an outlying island that is not doing so well, in an attempt to attract students, recently announced that it would be spending NT$65 million (US$2,25 million) to give each new student a laptop computer. This is the largest total scholarship ever given out by a school in Taiwan. Even medical departments in private universities that used to be overloaded have begun offering large scholarships in an attempt to attract talented students to their institutions.
When people get sick, they feel bad and need to see a doctor right away, because the longer an illness is left untreated the worse it will get. Looking at the way these schools are recklessly throwing money around, we can see higher education in Taiwan is indeed sick. The ill, in this case our universities, all know they are very sick, but the only doctor that can help, the Ministry of Education, does not know how — or does not want — to treat them and is leaving everything in the hands of God.
The facts are clear. In 1998, slightly more than 260,000 people were born. Universities and technical colleges now take on about 310,000 students per year. By 2016, the people born in 1998 will be ready to go to university. Even if all of them go, there will be a shortage of about 50,000 students. What’s more, only about 70 percent of students go on to higher education, so things clearly don’t look too good.
There will be a presidential election in January 2016 — will the presidential candidates be ready to face these problems?
This year is the first year that students from China will be allowed to study at private Taiwanese schools under new guidelines drawn up by the ministry, but the results have not been good and only the top universities are able to attract students from other countries. Many less prestigious universities are therefore in dire straits, but if the government does not have any clear plans and complementary measures in place, I can’t see how these schools would close themselves down willingly.
A certain magazine quoted Minister of Education Wu Ching-ji (吳清基) as saying that the closure mechanisms of Taiwan’s universities are in place in case they are needed. At the moment, only the University Act (大學法) covers such matters, while specific laws on closure mechanisms for colleges and junior colleges have yet to be passed.
One university president said in private that he could understand Wu’s comments because not too many education ministers would want to be remembered for having closed several schools during their time in office, since it could damage their career prospects. However, this university president was wrong because a minister willing to close universities would go down in history as a resolute official with “guts.”
Universities are unwilling to close down of their own accord because they feel the government backs them anyway, while there are absolutely no incentives for private universities to close their doors.
For a school’s board of directors, closure would mean liquidation and many universities already have huge debts. Even in schools with passable finances, everything that would be left after liquidation — capital, land and buildings — would be seized and impounded by the state. Given the current closure mechanisms, it is really hard to imagine how any school would be willing to voluntary close down. In the end, the whole thing will become a complete mess that the government will have to deal with.
Letting a lot of universities remain in operation even though they should be closed harms many students. These schools will not exist in the future, so how can teachers concentrate on teaching and not feel worry and concern? And how are these schools meant to make long-term investments and plans for teaching and research? Still, such schools do everything they can each year to attract new students and offer higher education of low quality. This has misled many students and cheated their parents who pay the expensive tuition fees.
Many universities are on their deathbed, but where are the doctors with a conscience and moral sense?
Chang Ruay-shiung is vice president of National Dong Hwa University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry