A series of negotiations between Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) has produced 15 agreements, but Taiwanese are undoubtedly disappointed about the implementation and results of these agreements.
The agreements were pushed through hurriedly, with the Chinese dominating the negotiations. Furthermore, they are mired in problems, including slow or non-existent implementation, monopolization by a minority of entrepreneurs resulting in the uneven distribution of benefits, commercial disputes and having their benefits overblown by government propaganda so that the public is disappointed by the actual results.
It was announced that the seventh round of talks between Chiang and Chen will include the signing of a cross-strait investment protection agreement. This development is worrying because the effects of a such an agreement would be much more far reaching than the previous agreements.
Media reports from both sides of the Taiwan Strait say that the agreement is set to work both ways, meaning that it would affect the security and property of all people investing between Taiwan and China.
The agreement is also said to include the issue of allowing a greater inflow of Chinese investments in Taiwan. This is likely to bring about a major shift in cross-strait relations and would effect Taiwan’s survival and development. This is a major issue that all political forces in Taiwan must face up to, no matter whether they belong to the pan-blue or pan-green camps.
Chinese capital has been flowing into Taiwan through various channels for quite a long time. Through these investments, China aims to shake the foundations of Taiwan as a nation. Some prominent examples are the joint bid by China Strategic Holdings and Primus Financial Holdings to acquire Nan Shan Life Insurance, as well as the Data Systems Consulting case and the Huawei Technologies case.
The National Security Council has said publicly that it would maintain tight control over certain companies that have Chinese investors, but it is not yet clear how effective that control would be. The truth is that all businesses that have Chinese investors have a dual mission: They want to do business, but they also have political motives.
In Hong Kong, the most serious problem with Chinese-owned businesses is the lack of mechanisms for corporate oversight, and this has had a negative influence on Hong Kong’s economic development. The bankruptcy of the Guangdong International Trust and Investment Corp and the debt crisis of Guangdong Investment Ltd are typical cases in point.
If the deregulation of Chinese investment is a done deal, then Chinese capital will penetrate throughout Taiwan. If that were to happen, the governments on both sides of the Strait would have both their ability to govern domestically and monitor and control internationally put to the test.
The sad thing is that since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, his administration has kept opening the nation to China and deregulating cross-strait ties. However, the Ma administration has been the subordinate and passive party in the negotiations, and has fallen short or failed to deliver on the agreements it has signed. It has proved incapable of monitoring and managing the situation.
One can only hope that the legislature will perform its oversight duties effectively. Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers, as the opposition party, should do their best to keep an eye on what is going on before agreements are signed and use legislation to regulate the process.
It is worth referring to the way the US has handled such issues. Four years ago, then-US president George W. Bush signed the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007, after which the US Treasury Department formulated the Regulations Pertaining to Mergers, Acquisitions and Takeovers by Foreign Persons, whose function is to govern the implementation of the act.
The 2007 law and associated regulations are designed to ensure that US national security is not harmed or threatened in the course of economic and trade dealings with other countries, especially China.
Tung Li-wen is an advisory committee member of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs