Wed, Jul 27, 2011 - Page 9 News List

Europe must fight homegrown right-wing extremism, racism

By Aslak Sira Myhre  /  The Guardian, OSLO

Like every other resident of Oslo, I have walked in the streets and buildings that have been blown away. I have even spent time on the island where young political activists were massacred. I share the fear and pain of my country, but the question is always why, and this violence was not blind.

The terror of Norway has not come from Islamic extremists. Nor has it come from the far left, even though both these groups have been accused time after time of being the inner threat to our “way of living.” Up to and including the terrifying hours that Friday afternoon, the little terror my country has experienced has come from the far right.

For decades, political violence in this country has been almost the sole preserve of neo-Nazis and other racist groups. During the 1970s, they bombed left-wing bookstores and a May Day demonstration. In the 1980s, two neo-Nazis were executed because they were suspected of betraying the group. In the past two decades, two non-white Norwegian boys have died as a result of racist attacks. No foreign group has killed or hurt people on Norwegian territory since World War II, except for the Israeli security force Mossad, which targeted and killed an innocent man by mistake in Lillehammer in 1973.

Even with this history, when the devastating terror hit us we instantly suspected the Islamic world. It was the jihadists. It had to be. It was denounced as an attack on Norway, on our way of life. In Oslo, young women wearing hijab and Arab-looking men were harassed as soon as the news broke.

Small wonder. For at least 10 years we have been told that terror comes from the east. That an Arab is suspicious, that all Muslims are tainted. We regularly see people of color being examined in private rooms in airport security; we have endless debates on the limits of “our” tolerance. As the Islamic world has become the Other, we have begun to think that what differentiates “us” from “them” is the ability to slaughter civilians in cold blood.

There is, of course, another reason why everybody looked for al-Qaeda. Norway has been part of the war in Afghanistan for 10 years, we took part in the Iraq war for some time and we are eager bombers of Tripoli. There is a limit to how long you can partake in war before war reaches you.

However, although we all knew it, the war was rarely mentioned when the terrorist hit us. Our first response was rooted in irrationality: It had to be “them.” I felt it myself. I feared that the war we took abroad had come to Norway. And what then? What would happen to our society? To tolerance, public debate and most of all, to our settled immigrants and their Norwegian-born children?

It was not thus. Once again, the heart of darkness lies buried deep within ourselves. The terrorist was a white Nordic male; not a Muslim, but a Muslim hater.

As soon as this was established, the slaughter was discussed as the deed of a mad man; it was no longer seen as primarily an attack on our society. The rhetoric changed, the headlines of the newspapers shifted their focus. Nobody talks about war anymore. When “terrorist” is used, it is most certainly singular, not plural — an individual rather than an undefined group which is easily generalized to include sympathizers and anyone else you fancy. The terrible act is officially a national tragedy. The question is, would it have been thus if the killer was a mentally ill man with an Islamic background?

This story has been viewed 4214 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top