The public is up in arms at the news that Banciao District Court Judge Lu Chun-chieh (盧軍傑) last Wednesday ordered the release of taxi driver Hsieh Tung-hsien (謝東憲), who is facing charges of sexually assaulting a female Japanese exchange student, on NT$50,000 bail. A quarter-million netizens have called for Lu’s head, branding him a “dinosaur judge” as the “White Rose” movement launched another attack on the judiciary.
The outrage, born out of compassion for the alleged victim and frustration at the judge’s decision to release Hsieh, who then went missing for several days before being rearrested on Sunday, quickly caused a massive reaction. While the public’s anger is justified, is it right that it be directed at the judge?
The decision on whether to detain the accused during the course of the investigation is based not on guilt or innocence, but on whether restricting the accused’s freedom of movement would ensure public safety and allow the investigation and trial to proceed. Given the presumption of innocence, a judge needs to be very cautious about ordering the detention of the accused. According to the Council of Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 665, the accused cannot be detained based on the seriousness of the crime alone; there must also be the possibility they will try to flee, destroy evidence or re-offend. The interpretation was made to protect the rights of the accused.
Several things have been overlooked in this case: first, the role of the prosecution. The prosecution merely ticked the box to indicate the serious nature of the crime as cause for detention, but failed to attend the hearing in person. Neither did the prosecution specify any potential flight risk, mention any police recommendation for preventive detention or even produce any evidence that Hsieh had a previous record of sexual assault or harassment.
These failures resulted from the negligence of the prosecution, not the judge. A judge has to weigh each individual case, balancing public safety against the rights of the individual.
The prosecution’s failure to offer any cause for detention beyond the seriousness of the crime went against the judicial interpretation, which was careless of them. However, the accused is a taxi driver and is likely to come into contact with women — it is certainly not inconceivable that he might re-offend and this should have been given careful consideration. The judge should have asked the prosecution to make the appropriate amendments to the documents and resubmit them. That he did not was careless. A bit more empathy on the part of the judge might have been wise.
Then there is public opinion. Here, the media are firmly on the side of the alleged victim and have already decided the accused is guilty. Also, netizens have unleashed their fury on the judge, without fully comprehending the facts about the detention process.
The White Rose movement’s ire was directed at the government, but it seems to have had quite some influence in getting judges to eventually rescind Hsieh’s bail order. It is difficult to tell whether the eventual decision to detain Hsieh was because of public opinion or the result of an independent reappraisal.
It is true that an outraged public has great influence, but it does not always see things as they are. The public has lost confidence in the judiciary and both judges and prosecutors are keen to push the blame on the other to escape the heat, often bending to public pressure. Judges and prosecutors are both part of the judicial system and should take responsibility accordingly.
Judicial bodies should stop looking to public pressure to drive reform and improve the system themselves, so that the practice of law is not distorted by populism and the public can rest assured that the system is delivering it the justice it expects.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry