At the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) congress on Saturday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) centered his presidential nomination acceptance speech around the alleged corruption of the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, and challenged the opposition’s ability to build a clean government.
He singled out former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) as one of the “corrupt officials from the former government” and pledged not to tolerate any form of corruption if he is re-elected in January’s presidential election.
Ma’s playing the anti-corruption card against the DPP follows former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) indictment last week on charges of embezzling US$7.8 million from secret diplomatic funds.
The corruption cases against the Chen family have been a political bonanza for the Ma administration, with Ma winning more than 7 million votes in the 2008 election largely thanks to a campaign strategy that targeted Chen’s corruption trial.
Ma’s speech on Saturday showed that once again fighting corruption would be the theme for his campaign, only this time he is seeking to make a connection between corruption and DPP Chairperson and presidential nominee Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
However, a large percentage of swing voters who gave their support to Ma in 2008 have shown their disappointment with his government’s performance over the past three years. The KMT has lost more than 2 million votes in recent elections.
According to various surveys, Ma’s approval rating has dropped to between 30 percent and 40 percent since he took office. In the latest poll released by the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), Tsai enjoyed a lead of 4.5 percentage points over Ma, with a support rate of 31.66 percent compared with Ma’s 27.12 percent, with 41.22 percent of voters undecided.
The KMT’s defeat in the five special municipality elections and legislative by-elections as well as Ma’s low approval ratings are warning signs. Unfortunately for Ma, targeting corruption claims against former presidents in his re-election campaign will hardly be an effective strategy in the face of mounting public resentment over the incompetence of his administration.
Moreover, the KMT brought an unprecedented level of corruption to Taiwan. Its attacks against the alleged misdeeds of the DPP and other former officials only remind voters of the KMT’s poor reputation and “black gold” tradition.
The Ma administration has done nothing to unambiguously prove that it has made real efforts to combat corruption.
Aside from turning a blind eye to the large number of KMT legislators and local politicians who have been involved in corruption and bribery cases, the KMT is yet to return the assets it stole from the government during its decades in power to the treasury.
Since he took over as KMT chairman in 2005, Ma has repeatedly promised to handle the remaining party assets — Central Investment Co — and purge the party of any business dealings. However, the KMT failed to sell the party-run business by June 30 as planned.
One should always reflect upon one’s own behavior before criticizing others. If Ma really wanted to fight corruption and build a clean government, he would explain the KMT’s handling of party assets to the public and clean the party roster of politicians tainted by rumors of corruption.
Shifting the focus to the alleged corruption of the former DPP government will not convince voters that a new Ma administration would be any cleaner — or that it would prove more effective in the areas that matter most to Taiwanese voters: the economy, jobs, the environment and preserving the “status quo” in cross-strait relations.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing