With the election campaign season approaching, the incumbent administration’s neutrality has emerged as an issue that needs to be kept under close public scrutiny.
Aside from keeping a close eye out for any abuse of administrative resources that could arise as a result of Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) acting as President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) running mate while at the same time keeping his post as head of the Executive Yuan, attention also needs to be paid to the remarks and conduct of various government officials and agencies to ensure they do not violate administrative neutrality or exploit administrative resources for bipartisan electoral gains.
Some incidents have recently given rise to such concerns among the general public.
First, we saw the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issue a statement on Thursday last week claiming the local media had falsely reported that Member of the European Parliament Hans van Baalen had said he would vote for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) if he were Taiwanese. Public embarrassment followed just days later when Van Baalen openly dismissed the ministry’s statement, asserting that he did indeed make such a declaration.
The ministry subsequently cited international common courtesy as a reason why foreign nationals should not get involved in or interfere in other countries’ politics.
However, it is interesting to note that the ministry’s statement also mentioned that, during his meeting with Ma last week, Van Baalen had expressed warm words to Ma and said he hoped he would get re-elected. So it is acceptable when a foreign national expresses a wish for Ma to win the election, but warrants action from the ministry when the same foreign national voices support for the opposition leader?
Van Baalen was after all only stating his personal opinion, and did not violate the Election and Recall Act (選罷法) that bans foreigners from publicly stumping for election candidates — as Nobel Peace Prize winner Betty Williams had done in 2004, when she was fined for stumping for the DPP presidential campaign.
MOFA’s duty should be to safeguard and elevate the nation’s dignity and international standing, not to pay attention to which foreign national heaps praise on opposition leaders. It would be truly shameful if the nation’s foreign ministry is to start seeing through bipartisan lenses and act as if it were a branch of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Another recent case stirred up controversy by potentially violating administrative neutrality. That was the case of New Taipei City (新北市) official Lee Chien-lung (李乾龍) who, under the name of a national township chief alliance, last week hosted a banquet for hundreds of township and district chiefs during which support for the Ma-Wu ticket was voiced.
While Lee argued that the event was a routine gathering that took place outside his working hours and was therefore not in any way a violation of administrative neutrality or an act of bribery, the public’s impression is that this should not have happened.
With both the KMT and the DPP campaigns picking up steam, all government officials and agencies should be reminded of their duties and their jobs on the taxpayers’ payroll — to serve the nation, not a specific political party or politician.
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement