The deadline for filing taxes has come and gone. Many people are complaining about high taxes, apparently unaware that they are the ultimate beneficiaries of this money. The fact is that the basic tax burden in Taiwan is among the lowest in the world.
Last year, the tax rate was 11.9 percent, lower not only than that of European countries with large welfare states, but also lower than those of the US and Japan, which stood at 19.5 and 17.3 percent respectively. If you add social security contributions, the 2009 figure goes up to 18.8 percent, but it was still lower than in Japan, South Korea or the US. In the context of these figures, there must be another reason why the majority of the population believes the tax burden is excessive in Taiwan.
Payroll tax accounts almost entirely for comprehensive income tax. According to the figures for comprehensive income tax receipts for 2008, salaries and wages on average accounted for 70 percent of taxable income. This is particularly true for the 3.1 million households which have an annual income of less than NT$1 million (US$35,000) and are still liable to pay income tax. With salaries accounting for more than 76 percent of the taxable income, there is the rather strange situation in which most do indeed have a heavy tax burden.
Another reason employee tax burdens seem quite heavy is that, since it came to power, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government has introduced a string of measures to reduce non-payroll taxes. First there was the inheritance tax reform of early 2009, which replaced the progressive tax rate with a flat rate, entirely negating the Robin Hood element of the previous system and wiping NT$6.6 billion from inheritance tax revenue the year the policy was introduced.
In April last year, the government went on to reduce the corporate income tax rate from 20 percent to 17 percent — lower than the rate in China, Japan and the US — arguing that this would attract more foreign investment. The result was that direct foreign investment last the year fell 20.56 percent, with even more capital flowing into China while Taiwan bled NT$48.5 billion in tax revenue. The loss to Taiwan’s coffers was significantly higher than the NT$34.3 billion predicted by the Ministry of Finance. In addition, comprehensive income tax fell by NT$2.1 billion. It seems the ministry got its sums horribly wrong vis-a-vis encouraging both investment and salary increases.
The government has elected to reduce taxes rather than improve national infrastructure and facilities, much like a company that chooses to boost sales by slashing prices rather than focusing on product quality.
At the end of the day, that company is still going to have to think about what this means for its profit margin. If the state bears the brunt of cutting costs for companies by reducing taxes, it is going to have to increase its own expenditure on payments to manage its huge accumulated debt. It could do this by cutting social welfare commitments, such as subsidized preschool education, but this would present its own challenges as the public begins to question where its money is being spent and whether taxpayers’ dollars are going to the right place.
If the government truly wants the public to feel at ease with paying taxes, it needs to stop helping the comfortably well-off to cut costs and concentrate instead on a thorough reassessment of the past few years’ tax-cutting measures, which are damaging the nation’s finances.
Kevin Chang is research coordinator with the Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and