Despite recent rhetoric that the “520 Curse” — so called because the TAIEX has dropped significantly on every May 20, the date Taiwan’s presidents are inaugurated, in recent years — failed to materialize this year, the TAIEX did in fact fall by 55.85 points to close at 8,837 on that day. Over the past three years, government officials and the media have waxed lyrical about how the government has stabilized cross-strait relations and how much the “peace dividend” will reinvigorate the economy and boost the stock market. The markets, however, continue to tell a somewhat different story. When compared with the emerging stock exchanges in Asia, the TAIEX has performed the worst.
For example, the South Korean Stock Exchange (KRX) closed at 1,885.37 on May 19, 2008 and at 2,111.50 on May 20 last year. This represents an increase of 11.99 percent in the same period that the TAIEX fell by 4.92 percent. The financial crisis hit both countries, but South Korean investors still made money. The same could not be said for investors in Taiwan, who were holding out — in vain, we now know — for “Ma’s Magic” and the “ECFA effect” to kick in, expecting the TAIEX to top 10,000 points by now. It is interesting to note that had the TAIEX performed as well as the KRX over the same period it would now stand at 10,490 points.
If we look at the performance of Southeast Asian countries, the comparison is even starker. In the same period the Thai Stock Exchange rose 23.27 percent from 870 to 1,073, the Philippines Stock Exchange climbed 48.92 percent, from 2,877 to 4,285 and the Indonesian Stock Exchange went from 2,510 to 3,873, an increase of 54.33 percent.
So why is it that Taiwan’s stock exchange is performing so comparatively poorly? The answer quite simple: It is because Taiwan has been paying “peace dividends” to China for so long.
What is the actual scale of these dividends that Taiwan has been handing over to China in he past three years? You just need to look at the 102 percent increase in investment that Taiwan made in China last year, to US$12.23 billion, with a further increase of 33.29 percent from January to February. These figures do not include the money spent on down payments for the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA).
If the government does not restrict the types of permissible investment in China, and allows 20 or so overseas listed companies, including Taiwanese-owned firms listed abroad, to issue Taiwan depository receipts in Taiwan, each company will be able to make off with hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars.
Why kill the golden goose? Foreign investment in Taiwan is down 20 percent and now stands at only US$3.8 billion. It is ridiculous to imagine that we can rely on the ECFA alone to increase foreign investment at home.
In contrast, China has only invested US$133 million in Taiwan, and sent about a million tourists. The government is touting the fact that last year Chinese tourists spent almost US$2 billion in Taiwan, but about 5.5 million Taiwanese tourists went to China in the same period. The government has shot itself in the foot, gaining so little in return and putting so much at risk, not least our national sovereignty.
When the recent WHO memo scandal was revealed, the stock market took a beating. It would have been amazing if it hadn’t.
Many pro-China commentators would have us believe that with the ECFA, Taiwan will become a way into China for other countries and some kind of regional center. I urge all those who invest in the stock market to pay these commentators no mind. Such a contention is as ridiculous as suggesting that Penghu could become a trade link between China and Taiwan, or a cross-strait logistics center.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs