She is smart, capable and a loving mother to three young children, but Rebecca is battling an often hidden feature of Australian society that has taken her to the brink of suicide — a gambling addiction.
“I have a hideous gambling problem,” the 36-year-old says. “For someone who can have a family and be very articulate and can be sensible in so many ways ... just to have something that I have no control over — people don’t see it.”
“With alcohol or drugs you see it. With a gambler it’s hidden,” she says.
Australians like a bet — on the horses, football games, at casinos, even on the outcome of coin tosses in the national game of “two up.”
However, the most popular form of betting is on electronic poker machines or “pokies,” with the devices installed in pubs and clubs taking more than half of the A$19 billion (US$20 billion) the nation spent on gambling in 2008 and 2009.
The country has about 200,000 pokie machines, one of the highest concentrations per capita in the world, and the “one-armed bandits” are hugely popular, contributing some A$5 billion in tax revenues each year.
According to the Productivity Commission, 600,000 Australians — 4 percent of the adult population — gamble on the pokies at least once a week, many enjoying the social setting and escapism it can provide.
However, it found about 15 percent of regular players were problem gamblers, accounting for about 40 percent of total spending on the machines that spin so quickly they can take thousands of dollars from a luckless punter each hour.
The link between pokies and the social costs of problem gambling are now under the spotlight in Canberra, with the government poised to introduce limits on betting on the machines, outraging the pub and club industry.
Key independent Member of Parliament Andrew Wilkie, whose support for Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s fragile Labor-led coalition government is vital to its survival, is insisting on reforms to limit the amount people can bet.
Gillard has backed Wilkie’s push for a pre-commitment system for all machines that allow a single bet of more than A$1, under which gamblers would be unable to bet beyond a nominated limit.
However, the decision has prompted outrage from the clubs industry, which has unleashed a furious A$20 million publicity campaign under the war cry: “It’s un-Australian.”
“The heritage we are looking to defend is the right of Australians’ being able to gamble with their money without being treated like they are doing something shameful or wrong,” Clubs New South Wales spokesman Jeremy Bath said.
Bath said the reforms, and the costs of implementing them, would undermine the future of the industry without helping problem gamblers, who would be pushed to online betting, which he said studies showed was more addictive.
“This technology, through its punishment of the recreational gambler, will decimate club revenue by at least 40 percent. This is a figure no business, let alone one that is not for profit, could ever hope to survive,” he said.
Bath points out that clubs with pokies are not-for-profit businesses, which channel part of their revenue back into the community by funding sporting and recreational facilities, among other things.
Critics also say the pre-commitment idea is a “nanny state” measure that could allow the government to keep a tab on gamblers through the mandatory card system, resulting in a loss of freedom and privacy.
Wilkie’s supporters, however, say that clubs that are reliant on problem gamblers do not deserve to be in business and the loss of privacy argument is hypocrisy, given that clubs closely monitor their clients through their loyalty schemes.
The idea of a pre-commitment card has been welcomed by some in the counseling field as a step forward even if it fails to solve the problem.
“It may prevent people to slip towards a full-blown addiction in the first place, but for problem gamblers, the way out is motivation and therapy,” said Christopher Hunt, who works at a Sydney University treatment clinic.
Baptist minister Tim Costello, a long-time campaigner against the pokies, said he has done too many funerals for people who committed suicide after losing their marriages, jobs and homes to gambling.
“The fruit machines in Britain, you can lose A$30-A$40 an hour, it’s a £50 [US$82] payout per maximum,” he said.
“[In Australia] you can lose four or five grand an hour, the maximum is A$15,000 actually, from pokies and the average losses per hour are something around A$2,000. Who spends A$2,000 on an hour’s entertainment?” he said.
Clubs NSW disputes the A$15,000 figure, saying the most a person could lose in an hour in New South Wales was estimated by the Productivity Commission at A$1,200 and this was if they were betting the maximum of A$10 each time.
Rebecca, not her real name, has lost count of the number of times she has pawned jewelry or been unable to pay bills or fund a night out because of her addiction to the pokies.
Over the years, her relationships, work, finances and health have suffered, to the point where she found herself in hospital two months ago after trying to kill herself.
She is dealing with her problem through Gamblers Anonymous, but says she knows, from her experiences in Sydney’s pubs and clubs, that there are a lot of other addicts who are not receiving help.
“You see it. You see the fury of the money going in and [people] not pulling at a win, but continuing to play or pulling out and going to another machine and losing it all,” she said.
“It’s quite scary, the amount of people that are out there in pubs that if you were to look at their faces, they look absolutely miserable. And they don’t seek help.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs