Localized food scares that wind up having international implications have been around for a while. The melamine scare in powdered milk, the various bovine spongiform encephalopathy (commonly known as mad cow disease) scares and numerous outbreaks of pathogens like E. coli in anything from peanut butter to spinach have invariably started out locally — in the US, China, UK or other countries — and then went global if those countries exported their tainted goods. Taiwan now finds itself in the grips of a new scare owing to some companies’ illegal use of the chemical di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in food additives.
These scares, however serious they might be, distract public attention from a bigger, more important and ultimately much more dire problem — the complete disappearance of food from the bowls and tables of millions of people worldwide.
In the midst of this latest food fiasco, the Taiwanese public was barely aware of a recent report by the US charity Oxfam warning that the global food system was stumbling toward a catastrophic breakdown. Taiwan might feel safely removed from any potential lack of food with its numerous traditional wet markets, supermarkets, hypermarts and its rice bowl agricultural zones, but it is just as likely to feel the effect of the coming global food pinch as any other country.
Oxfam warned that in 20 years, global food prices would double because of food price inflation, oil price hikes, misuse of land and water and creeping climate change. As climate change picks up after 20 years, food prices are expected to double again. At the same time, with rising populations around the world, demand for food is expected to be 70 percent higher in 2050.
Taiwan is not safe from these global changes. Although Taiwan has traditionally grown almost all the rice needed to meet domestic demand, that portion has been decreasing since Taiwan joined the WTO in 2002, with WTO ascension depending on Taiwan importing less expensive rice.
In the meantime, many Taiwanese have made the switch from rice to wheat, relying on the imported grain for most of their caloric needs, even prompting the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to initiate a campaign urging people to go back to locally grown rice.
Plummeting self-sufficiency and rising food imports are not the only issues that make Taiwan vulnerable to global food shocks. With the Ma administration’s outright emphasis on Asian Tiger-era industrial economic growth, farms that could be used to shore up Taiwan’s food banks are either being polluted or expropriated for large construction projects. Land that could be used to grow rice is being used for more buildings to be sold as cookie-cutter real estate.
Water is another problem. Although Taiwan has dodged the bullet year after year as typhoons replenished dangerously low reservoirs, leaky pipes and the resulting huge amounts of wasted water make it likely that some day, fields will dry up and precious food will be lost, especially because the electronics industry is prioritized in water use.
The list goes on. As Taiwan’s population declines, there will be less people to till the nation’s fields.
Taiwan is facing the perfect storm, despite its seeming smorgasbord of food. Decreasing -self---reliance, misuse of land, waste of water and an aging population all threaten Taiwan’s food supply. And as imported food becomes increasingly expensive, who is to stop unscrupulous companies from saving money by using illegal additives in manufactured food products?
Unless all these problems are addressed, Taiwan’s food scares will become a food nightmare.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs