A lot of attention has been focused recently on an internal WHO memo that categorizes Taiwan as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Opposition parties accuse the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of allowing Taiwan’s sovereignty to be eroded through what they see as erroneous policies. The administration, of course, takes a different view, stressing its achievement in connecting Taiwan with international healthcare structures through its participation in the WHO.
It is no surprise that the government and its critics have conflicting views on this issue, but beyond that there are some more crucial and practical questions that need to be considered now that Taiwan has started participating in the WHO and other UN agencies as an observer.
The first relates to the official title under which Taiwan becomes a member or signatory of UN agencies. Taiwan has gained the right to attend the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an observer, but the ultimate aim is to join as a full member. In the past, plans have been made to apply for WHO membership as a “health entity.”
The problem is the WHO is part of the UN system which only recognizes sovereign states as members.
As such, the WHO has not offered more relaxed conditions for membership, as has been the case with some international organizations that Taiwan has already joined, such as the WTO, which allows “separate customs territories” to become members, or regional fisheries management organizations, whose membership is open to “fishing entities.”
Unless the WHO agrees to change the status required for membership, there would still be an obstacle to Taiwan’s aim to gain membership. However, it is worth noting that there have been instances of other UN agencies amending the status required for membership. For example, it has been possible for some regional economic organizations, such as the EU, to become signatories to certain multilateral treaties alongside sovereign states.
The government has also set joining the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the International Civil Aviation Organization as priority targets for participation in the international community.
However, even if Taiwan were to take titles, such as an “environmental entity” or “aviation entity,” as the model for joining, it would still encounter organizational obstacles and questions about the price to be paid in political terms.
What should the government’s priority be? Should the emphasis be on making solitary breakthroughs or should it be on negations with the international community, including China, on questions of Taiwan’s participation in the UN system? The latter approach might enable Taiwan to apply to join various agencies in one package, which would be more efficient and save costs.
The second question relates to Taiwan’s existing legal relationship with the WHO. The WHO memo that has been in the news was issued in September last year. Its main purpose is to tell people working at the WHO how to handle technical and procedural questions to do with the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) as they apply to Taiwan. Given that Taiwan is getting more involved in the international healthcare system, the WHO Secretariat must sooner or later deal with setting standard restrictions on Taiwan under the “one China” framework.
Taiwan is still not an official member, and it is not clear when it will become one. The IHR is legally binding and affects countries’ international health policies. So, at the same time as enjoying rights, signatories have to live up to their international obligations.
However, the legal nature of treaties is such that a treaty does not apply to a country unless that country has agreed to it. So, one can ask whether Taiwan must accept the IHR when it only has observer status. If Taiwan voluntarily abides by the IHR, it is still worth thinking about what legal effect it has. In other words, apart from voicing objections to the wording of the controversial memo that belittles Taiwan’s status, it is more important to do some research into the memo’s practical legal implications.
The third point to consider is whether Taiwan has done all that needs to be done in preparation for becoming a member of the WHO. Gaining admittance to the WHA as an observer was the result of long-term efforts by the entire country and it is something worthy of celebration by everyone. However, other than having the government advertise Taiwan’s achievements in the field of health and expressing Taiwan’s willingness to help developing countries improve their healthcare services, the nation should work hard to prepare for a possible future role as a full WHO member. This will be necessary if it is to proceed from meaningful participation to making meaningful contributions.
There are many developing countries that are members of the WHO, but lack the expertise needed to take a leading role in setting the rules. These countries tend to get marginalized. Taiwan does not lack talent in medicine or healthcare; what it lacks is a team of talented people who, aside from health expertise, are also familiar with negotiating, have a thorough knowledge of international law and are highly proficient in foreign languages. These are challenges that the nation must face if it aspires to get involved in international environmental organizations.
There is much talk about the erosion of Taiwan’s sovereignty, but this is something the nation has had to deal with ever since it withdrew from the UN in 1971. It is to be hoped that the government’s critics can make constructive proposals about how to expand the nation’s international space. As to the government, it should tell the public what concrete measures it has in mind for putting Taiwan on a par with other countries.
Ni Kuei-jung is a professor at National Chiao Tung University’s Institute of Technology Law.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and