Now that the presidential candidates for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have been decided, the rumblings of preparations for battle can be felt. Concerned about his low popularity ratings, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has thrust himself into the front line, taking a much more prominent role in decisionmaking, beyond his constitutional remit. Meanwhile, the man who should be doing this, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), has been momentarily sidelined.
While it is true that Ma has spearheaded many new policies of late, these have been rushed through, and not given the careful consideration they deserve. There’s no telling whether they will have their intended effect, or do his re-election bid any good.
Last month, the president personally announced that he was withdrawing his support for the construction of Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co’s naphtha cracker, in a bid to put an end to the war of words between supporters of industrial development and environmental groups. Knowing that moderate voters tend to support environmental issues, Ma ditched his administration’s support for the economic development side of the debate. All he was concerned about was preventing his support base from shrinking and losing any more of the crucial central Taiwan vote.
Despite the financial abyss that the government is facing, Ma is going ahead with plans to increase salaries for public servants by 3 percent, and recently added raising the minimum wage to his plans. Businesses are not happy, but Ma is pushing for a raise in the third quarter. With a strengthening New Taiwan dollar cutting into many businesses’ profits, it is unlikely that companies will want to follow suit, dashing the government’s hopes of inspiring a commensurate rise in salaries in the private sector.
Then there is the question of rising oil prices. Didn’t Ma, during his 2008 presidential campaign, accuse the DPP of interfering with gas prices and not respecting market forces? Well, now he’s talking of subsidizing oil prices. So what if it will cost billions of NT dollars every year? Who cares that it goes against the principle of fairness, or the government policy of conserving energy resources? What’s more, the government is now talking of a mechanism of staggered subsidy increases.
Ma then sallied forth to drum up support among rice farmers, promising them he would increase the agreed purchasing price for rice. This will see the market price increase, but it is not yet rice harvesting season, so it will be the suppliers — not the farmers — who benefit. Caterers, restaurateurs and consumers will all fall foul of the market price increases.
It’s all about garnering votes. Any policy likely to be a vote-earner, the government jumps at. Who cares if the policy is likely to have drawbacks? So long as they won’t be too conspicuous, or indeed be noticed before the election, the government is happy to see them through now, and deal with the consequences later. Anything that is likely to cost Ma votes, or which may be controversial, has to be nipped in the bud, no matter what the department responsible for the policy has to say about it.
A perfect example of the government’s hasty approach to introducing populist policies is the fast-tracking of the luxury tax. For the vast majority, however, it’s a little bit too much like Christmas for comfort. One day of sugar-coated extravagance followed by a thud back to normality, with the electorate left to pay the consequences.
Voters are well aware of Ma’s electioneering tactics and propaganda, having gone through the 2008 presidential election campaign and almost three years of his presidency. Now that Ma is eyeing a second term, voters should ask themselves whether their lives have improved appreciably in the last three years. We all know the answer to that question.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under